IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH B: NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) BEFORE, SHRI G. S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A NO.8094/DEL/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-1 5 ) LATE NAFEESA NASEEM THROUGH LEGAL HEIR REHAN NASEEM (SON) C/O KAPIL GOEL ADV., F-26/124, SECTOR-7, ROHINI, DELHI-110 085. PAN-AMIPB 4403C VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-46(3), NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SH. R.K. GUPTA, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING 30.04.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 30.04.2021 ORDER PER G.S.PANNU, VP: THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A)-16, NEW DELHI DATED 29.11.2018. 2. NOBODY APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE TIME OF VIRTUAL HEARING BEFORE US. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, VI DE LETTER DATED 21 ST APRIL, 2021 HAS REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FI LED BY THE ASSESSEE AND 2 ITA NO .8094 /DEL/2018 LATE SMT. NAFEESA NASEEM THROUGH LEGAL HEIR REHAN NASEEM VS. ACIT STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DI SPUTE RELATING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. A CERTIFICATE TO THIS EFFECT UNDER SECTION 5(1) OF THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 HAS ALSO BEEN FILED. 3. LEARNED SENIOR DR HAS NO OBJECTION. 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ACCEPT THE REQUEST OF T HE ASSESSEE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTU AL HEARING ON 30 TH APRIL, 2021. SD/- SD/- (KUL BHARAT) (G.S.PANNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT PK/PS COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI