IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD SMC BENCH (CONDUCTED THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT) BEFORE: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI PANKAJBHAI B. PATEL, A-101, GALAXY SIGNATURE, SCIENCE CITY ROAD, SOLA, AHMEDABAD-380060 PAN: ACRPP3842N (APPELLANT) VS DCIT, CIRCLE PALANPUR (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY: SHRI L.P. JAIN, SR. D.R. ASSESSEE BY: SHRI M.K. PATEL, A.R. DATE OF HEARING : 09-07-2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 15-07-202 1 /ORDER PER : AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:- THIS ASSESSEES APPEAL FOR A.Y. 2016-17, ARISES FRO M ORDER OF THE CIT(A)-4, AHMEDABAD DATED 19-11-2019, IN PROCEEDIN GS UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961; IN SHORT THE ACT. 2. THE ASSESSEE FILED WRITTEN SUBMISSION TO WITHDRA W THE APPEAL ON THE GROUND THAT HE HAS OPTED TO AVAIL BENEFITS OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. WHEN THE MATTER WAS CALLED FOR HEARING, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE AT THE OUTSET HAS SUBMITTED THAT HE DOES N OT WANT TO PURSUE THE SAID ITA NO. 84 /AHD/2020 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17 I.T.A NO. 84/AHD/2020 A.Y. 2016-17 PAGE NO PANKAJBHAI B. PATEL VS. DCIT 2 APPEAL AND REQUESTED THAT HIS APPLICATION FOR WITHD RAWAL OF APPEAL MAY PLEASE BE GRANTED. 3. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVE NUE STATED THAT HE HAS NO OBJECTION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL IN THE CIRC UMSTANCES NARRATED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. 4. WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE SUBMISSION AND APPLICATIO N OF THE ASSESSEE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. A REFERENCE HAS BEEN MA DE IN SUB-SECTION (2) & (3) OF SECTION 4 OF DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCH EME, 2020 FOR THE PURPOSE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL. IN THE LIGHT OF T HE PROVISION MADE IN THE SCHEME AND AFTER CONSIDERING THE MATERIAL ON RECORD , THE AFORESAID REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE TO AVAIL T HE VSV SCHEME, 2020 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW IS ALLOWED. HOWEVER, IN CASE, ANY ISSUE IS REMAINED UN-RESOLVED UNDER THE SAID SCHEME, THEN, THE ASSESS EE WILL BE AT LIBERTY TO FILE THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION TO RECALL THIS ORDER TO RESTORE THE ORIGINAL APPEAL WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT PROVIDED IN THE ACT. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15-07-2021 SD/- SD/- (MADHUMITA ROY) (AMARJIT SINGH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD : DATED 15/07/2021 I.T.A NO. 84/AHD/2020 A.Y. 2016-17 PAGE NO PANKAJBHAI B. PATEL VS. DCIT 3 / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. ASSESSEE 2. REVENUE 3. CONCERNED CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER/ , / ,