Kamali Rajesh, CHENNAI V. ITO, CHENNAI

ITA 853/CHNY/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 131 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8678 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 month(s) 20 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 24-08-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 24-08-2016
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 04-04-2016
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A NATARAJA

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, CHENNAI . , . , BEFORE SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY , JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO. 853 /MDS/2016 / ASSESSMENT YEAR :20 11 - 12 SMT. KAMALI RAJESH, 185, BHARATHIDASAN STREET, VENKATADRI FLATS, BAKAR COLONY, VIRUGAMBAKKAN, CHENNAI 600 092. [PAN: A IKPK8231D ] VS. THE INCOME TAX OF FICER , INTERNATIONAL TAXATION I( 2 ), 121, M.G. ROAD, NUNGAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI 600 034. ( / APPELLANT ) ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI A. NATARAJA , J CIT / DATE OF HEARING : 24 . 0 8 .201 6 / DATE OF P RONOUNCEMENT : 24. 0 8 .201 6 / O R D E R PER DUVVURU RL REDDY , JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCO ME TAX (APPEALS) 1 6 , CHENNAI , DATED 22 . 0 1 .20 1 6 RELEVANT TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 11 - 12 . 2. N ONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE OR ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED WHEN THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING ON 06.06.2016 . ACCORDINGLY, THE BENC H HAS ADJOURNED THE HEARING AND DIRECTED I.T.A. NO . 853 /M/ 16 2 THE REGISTRY TO ISSUE NOTICE BY RPAD. DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE THROUGH RPAD [AD ON RECORD], NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE OR ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED WHEN THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING ON 24.08.2016. HENCE, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. 3. THEREFORE, HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRI BUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. (38 ITD 320) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THE 24 TH AUGUST , 201 6 AT CHENNAI. SD/ - SD/ - ( A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( DUVVURU RL REDDY ) JUDICIAL MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED, THE 24 . 0 8 .201 6 VM/ - / COPY T O: 1. / APPELLANT , 2. / RESPONDENT , 3. ( ) / CIT(A) , 4. / CIT , 5. / DR & 6. / GF.