Dinesh baheti, H.No.02/88, Housing Board Colony, Madanganj, Kishangarh, Ajmer, Ajmer V. ITO Ward-2, Kishangarh, Kishangarh

ITA 853/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3312 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 11-06-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Appeal Filed On: 11-06-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES A, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 853/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2015-16 DINESH BAHETI, H. NO. 02/88, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, MADANGANJ, KISHANGARH, AJMER (RAJ)-305801 CUKE VS. I.T.O., WARD-2, KISHANGARH. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AELPB 4222 J VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY: WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION. JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SHRI A.S. NEHRA (ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 11/06/2021 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 11/06/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A), AJMER DATED 17/07/2018 FOR THE A.Y. 2015-16. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED AN APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL MENTIONING THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME AND REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. ITA 853/JP/2019_ DINESH BAHETI VS ITO 2 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW ITS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 11 TH JUNE, 2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 11/06/2021 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SHRI DINESH BAHETI, KISHANGARH. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE I.T.O., WARD-2, KISHANGARH. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 853/JP/2019) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR