Survottam Enterprises Ltd., Kolkata V. ITO, Ward - 8(4), Kolkata, Kolkata

ITA 855/KOL/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 54723 (ITAT-KOLKATA)
• Duration Of Justice: 6 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-12-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2003-2004
• Appeal Filed On: 06-06-2011
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A K PRAMANIK

Judgement Text

, , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH : KOLKATA [ () )) ) , , . .. .!' !'!' !'. .. . , , , , #$ ] ]] ] [BEFORE HONBLE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM & HONBLE S RI C. D. RAO, AM] & / I.T.A NO. 855/KOL/2011 '( )*/ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2003-04 M/S.SURVOTTAM ENTERPRISES LTD. -VS.- I.T.O., WARD-8 (4), KOLKATA [PAN : AADCS 7858 N] KOLKATA [ ,- /APPELLANT ] [ ./,-/ RESPONDENT ] ,- / FOR THE APPELLANT : NONE ./,- / FOR THE RESPONDENT : SHRI A.K.PRAMANIK 0'1 2 '$ /DATE OF HEARING : 15.12.2011. 3) 2 '$ /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 15.12.2011. #4 /ORDER . .. .!' !'!' !'. .. . , , , , #$ PER C. D. RAO, A. M. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THIS APPEAL AGAINST THE ORD ER OF LD. CIT(A)-VIII, KOLKATA DATED 17.02.2011 PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2003 -04. 2. THIS APPEAL CAME FOR HEARING ON 18.08.2011 FOR T HE FIRST TIME AND NO ONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF ASSESSEE. NO ADJOURNMENT PETI TION HAS BEEN FILED THEN THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 15.12.2011 AND ISSUED NOTICE BY RP AD. BUT TODAY ALSO I.E. 15.12.2011 NO ONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF ASSESSEE NO R ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITION FOR NON-APPEARANCE HAS BEEN FILED BY ASSESSEE. THE POWE R OF ATTORNEY HAS ALSO NOT BEEN FILED. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT ASS ESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE THE APPEAL. 2 4. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE DE CISION IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL AS ASSESSEE NOT INTERESTED. 5. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APP ROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR RECALLING THIS ORDER, IF PREVENTED BY SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR NO N-APPEARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING. 6. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION. #4 $0# 5 0' 6 7 '$ ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15.12. 2011. SD/- SD/- [ , ] [ . .. .!' !'!' !'. .. . , , , , #$ ] [ MAHAVIR SINGH ] [ C. D. RAO ] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ('$) DATED : 15.12. 2011. [RG '89 : /.PS] #4 2 .; <#;)/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. SURVOTTAM ENTERPRISES, 9B, LORD SINHA ROAD, KOLKATA -700071. 2 I.T.O., WARD-8(4), KOLKATA 3. THE CIT, 4. THE CIT(A)-VIII, KOLKATA. 5. DR, KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA [/; ./ TRUE COPY] #4'0/ BY ORDER, 9 /ASSTT REGISTRAR