IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH C, NEW DELHI BEFORE : SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 858/DEL./2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12 LAKHANI RUBBER UDYOG (P) LTD., W-9, G.K. II, NEW DELHI. PAN AAACL3111E (APPELLANT) VS. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - II, FARIDABAD. (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY NONE REVENUE BY SH. ARUN KUMAR YADAV, SR. DR ORDER PER L.P. SAHU, A.M.: THE ASSESSEE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AGAI NST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A)-FARIDABAD DATED 01.12.2015 PASSED FO R THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12. 2. NONE IS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. NOTIC E FOR HEARING WAS SENT THROUGH REGISTERED POST AT THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN THE APPEAL PAPERS, WHICH HAS BEEN RETURNED BACK WITH THE REMARK OF POSTAL AUTHOR ITY THAT NO OFFICE (COMPANY) EXISTS AT THE GIVEN ADDRESS . NO OTHER ADDRESS OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY IS AVAILABLE ON RECORD. NO ANY WRITTEN REQU EST FOR ADJOURNMENT ON DATE OF HEARING 06.02.2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 06.02.2018 ITA NO. 858/DEL./2016 2 BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALSO AVAILABLE ON RECORD. IT, THEREFORE, APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE A PPEAL. THEREFORE, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE DESERVES TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION IN VIEW OF THE ORDERS OF TRIBUNAL IN CIT VS. MULTI PLA N INDIA (P) LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.) AND OF M.P. HIGH COURT IN ESTATE OF LATE TUK OJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP). 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED, AS INDIC ATED ABOVE. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 6 TH FEB. 2018. SD/- SD/- (H.S. SIDHU) (L.P . SAHU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 6 TH FEBRUARY, 2018 *AKS* COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: (1) THE APPELLANT (2) THE RESPONDENT (3) COMMISSIONER (4) CIT(A) (5) DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI