Kumari Meenakshi Rathore, Jaipur V. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3), Jaipur

ITA 873/JPR/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9493 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 8 month(s) 10 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 16-03-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 06-07-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MONISHA CHOUDHARYADDL CIT DHK
• Assessee Lawyers: WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION FILED

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES A, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 873/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14 KUMARI MEENAKSHI RATHORE, 373, DEVI NAGAR, NEW SANGANER ROAD, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. I.T.O., WARD 2(3), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AGGPR 5851 E VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY: WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION FILED JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY(ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 16/03/2021 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 16/03/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-1, JAIPUR DATED 20/04/2018 FOR THE A.Y. 2013-14. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, AN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. THE CONTENTION MADE IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: I HAVE FILED AN APPEAL BEFORE YOUR HONOR FOR THE AY 2013-14. THAT THE SAID APPEAL IS PENDING FOR DISPOSAL BEFORE YOUR HONOR. THAT I HAD OPTED VIVAD SE VISWAS SCHEME AND FILED FORM 1 AND 2 OF THE SAID SCHEME ON 20/06/2020. ITA 873/JP/2018_ KUMAR MEENAKSHI RATHORE VS ITO 2 THAT THE SAID FORM HAS BEEN APPROVED AND ACCORDINGLY FORM 3 IS ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR-1, JAIPUR ON 04/12/2020. COPY OF THE FORM 3 IS ENCLOSED HEREWITH FOR YOUR KIND PERUSAL. HENCE, I WANT TO WITHDRAW THE SAID APPEAL PENDING BEFORE YOUR HONOR. YOU ARE THEREFORE REQUESTED TO KINDLY TREAT THIS APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN AND OBLIGE. THANKING YOU YOURS FAITHFULLY KUMARI MEENAKSHI RATHORE 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW HER APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 16 TH MARCH, 2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 16/03/2021 *RANJAN ITA 873/JP/2018_ KUMAR MEENAKSHI RATHORE VS ITO 3 VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- KUMARI MEENAKSHI RATHORE, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE I.T.O., WARD 2(3), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 873/JP/2018) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR