Sree Siddaganga Matha Educational Association , Davanagere V. Income Tax Officer, Exemptions Ward-1 , Hubli

ITA 881/BANG/2024

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 130 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0142 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-09-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: PartlyAllowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 11-06-2024
• Assessment Year: 2021-2022
• Appeal Filed On: 08-05-2024
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RAMANATHAN
• Assessee Lawyers: K KOTRESH; C.A
• Keywords: Set aside
• Section: 154; 143(1); 139(1)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.881/Bang/2024 Assessment Year : 2021-22 Sree Siddaganga Matha Educational Association., 2347, Siddalingeshwara Nagar, Davanagere City S.O, Davanagere – 577 002. PAN – AANTS 1958 G Vs. The Income Tax Officer, (Exemptions), Ward – 1, Hubli. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri K Kotresh, C.A Revenue by : Shri Ramanathan, Addl. CIT (DR) Date of hearing : 12.06.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 03.09.2024 O R D E R PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Addl./JCIT (A) – 10, Mumbai dated 14/03/2024 in DIN No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2023-24/1062657260(1) for the assessment year 2021- 22. 2. The only issue raised by the assessee is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in denying the exemption claimed u/s 11(2) of the Act, though the Form 10 was filed manually within the stipulated time. ITA No.881/Bang/2024 Page 2 of 4 . 3. In the present case, the assessee has filed I ts return of income after claiming the amount set apart for Rs. 1,60,50,000/- under the provisions of sec. 11(2) of the Act but the same was denied while processing the return u/s 143(1) of the Act in the absence of form 10 filed electronically. 4. On appeal, the ld. CIT(A) confirmed the intimation generated u/s 143(1) of the Act. 5. Being aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us. 6. The ld. AR before us contended that at the relevant point of time, there was no option available to file Form 10 in pursuance to the provisions of sec. 11(2) of the Act while filing the return of income online. Therefore, the assessee has filed Form 10 manually before the due date of filing the Income-tax return. The ld. AR in support of his contention filed the acknowledgment of the post office demonstrating that From 10 was sent to the jurisdictional AO dated 25/02/2022, whereas the date for return filing was 15-03-2022 for the year under consideration. 7. On the other hand, the ld. DR vehemently supported the orders of the authorities below. 8. We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the materials available on record. It is a fact on record that the assessee has filed Form 10 manually before the due date of filing the ITA No.881/Bang/2024 Page 3 of 4 . return of income with the jurisdictional AO, therefore, we are of the view that the assessee cannot be denied the benefit claimed by it u/s 11(2) of the Act. In holding so, we draw support and guidance from the order of this Tribunal in the case of Navodaya Education Trust Vs. DCIT reported in [2021] 130 taxmann.com 256 (Bangalore – Trib.), wherein it is held as under: “30. However; in the present case, the assessee has not filed Form 10 manually before the due date of filing return of income u/s. 139(1) of the Act. Being so, the decisions relied on by the id. AR supra are of no assistance to the assessee. On this count, in our opinion, it is mandatory on the part of assessee to file Form 10-' manually though not electronically before the due date of filing of return of income with the jurisdictional AO. Since the assessee has even failed to file Form 10 manually, the assessee cannot seek to rectify the order of intimation passed u/s. 143(1) in the petition filed u/s. 154 on 11-1-2018. Accordingly, the first ground of assessee is dismissed.” 8.1 In view of the above and respectfully following the order of this Tribunal, we set aside the findings of the ld. CIT(A) and direct the AO to allow the benefit of exemption u/s 11(2) of the Act as claimed by the assessee as per the provisions of law. Hence, the ground of appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. 9. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in court on 3 rd day of Sept, 2024 Sd/- Sd/- (GEORGE GEORGE K) (WASEEM AHMED) Vice President Accountant Member Bangalore, Dated, 3 rd Sept, 2024 / vms / ITA No.881/Bang/2024 Page 4 of 4 . Copy to: 1. The Applicant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The CIT(A) 5. The DR, ITAT, Bangalore. 6. Guard file By order Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Bangalore