Subramani Balamurugan, Thammampatty V. ITO, ward 1(6), Salem

ITA 889/CHNY/2024

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 101 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6112 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-07-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 23-06-2024
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Appeal Filed On: 01-04-2024
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “ए” ायपीठ चे ई म । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय ी महावीर िसंह, उपा ! एवं माननीय ी मनोज कुमार अ%वाल ,लेखा सद( के सम!। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपील सं./ ITA No.889/Chny/2024 (िनधा)रण वष) / As sessment Year: 2017-18) Shri Subramani Balamurugan 3, Sri Dhanam Stores, Mariyamman Kovil Street Udayarpalayam, Thammampatty-636 113. बनाम / V s. ITO Ward-1(6), Salem. थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AWIPB-7707-M (अपीलाथ /Appellant) : ( थ / Respondent) अपीलाथ कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri S.Sridhar(Advocate) Erode - Ld.AR थ कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri AR V Sreenivasan (Addl.CIT) - Ld. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 24-06-2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 03-07-2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1.Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 arises out of an order passed by Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] on 29-01-2024 in the matter of an an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s 143(3) of the Act on 30-12-2019. The registry has noted delay of 4 days in the appeal, which stand condoned. 2. During hearing, Ld. AR drew attention to para-6 of the impugned order and pleaded for another opportunity of hearing before lower authorities which has been opposed by Ld. Sr. DR. In the assessment order, Ld. AO made addition of cash deposit for Rs.10.29 Lacs since the assessee could not submit any valid explanation. The situation remained the same during first appellate proceedings. Accordingly, impugned addition was confirmed. The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee is in a position to substantiate the same if another opportunity is granted to the assessee. 3. Accepting the prayer of Ld. AR, we restore the appeal back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case. 4. The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 3 rd July,2024 Sd/- Sd/- (MAHAVIR SINGH) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) उपा45 / VICE PRESIDENT लेखा सद7 / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER चे9ई Chennai; िदनांक Dated :03-07-2024 DS आदेशकीIितिलिपअ%ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ /Appellant 2. थ /Respondent 3. आयकरआयुA/CIT Salem. 4. िवभागीय ितिनिध/DR 5. गाडFफाईल/GF