IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A.NO. 891/DEL/2012 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07 LIFESTYLE TEXWORKS PVT. LTD., C/O DD BANSAL ASSOCIATES, CA, M-304, DHARMA APARTMENTS, 2, IP EXTN., DELHI. PAN : AAACL7069F VS. ACIT, CIRCLE 4(1), NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MS VEENA JOSHI, DR O R D E R PER A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR A.Y. 2 006-07 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT (A)-VII, NEW DELHI, DATED 21.02.20 11. 2. THE MATTER WAS ORIGINALLY POSTED FOR HEARING ON 23.04.2012 WHEN NONE HAD PUT IN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSE E AND THE MATTER WAS, THEREFORE, ADJOURNED TO 09.08.2012. TODAY ALSO, NO NE HAS PUT IN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. KEEPING IN V IEW THESE FACTS, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERES TED IN PROSECUTING ITS APPEAL. THEREFORE, CONSIDERING THESE FACTS AND KEE PING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE ITAT RULES AS WERE CONSIDERED BY THE 2 TRIBUNAL IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD, 38 ITD 320 (DEL) AND BY THE HONBLE M.P.HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UNADMITTED. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. 4. THE ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 09.08. 2012. SD/- SD/- [SHAMIM YAHYA] [A.D. JAIN] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 09.08.2012. DK COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ITAT, DELHI BENCHES