Kirankumar Jayantilal Maha, Ahmedabad V. The ACIT, Circle-6(1), Ahmedabad

ITA 920/AHD/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 116 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8965 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 27-06-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 12-04-2018
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD A BENCH BEFORE: SHR I SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER KIRANKUMAR JAYANTILAL MALA, 14, CHAROTAR PATEL HOUSING SOCIETY LTD., MANINAGAR RAILWAY CROSSING ROAD, AHMEDABAD - 3800 0 8 PAN: AIHPM7665G (APPELLANT) VS THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 6( 1 ) , AHMEDABAD (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY : S H RI S.K. DEV , SR. D . R. ASSESSEE BY: NONE DATE OF HEARING : 25 - 06 - 2 019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 27 - 06 - 2 019 / ORDER P ER : AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBE R : - THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A) - 6, AHMEDABAD DATED 15 - 11 - 2017 . I T A NO . 920 / A HD/20 18 A SS ESSMENT YEAR 2014 - 15 I.T.A NO. 920 /AHD/20 18 A.Y. 2014 - 15 PAGE NO KIRANKUM AR J. MALA VS. ACIT 2 2. IT IS NOTICED THAT NONE HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE ON THE DATE OF HEARING TAKEN PLACE ON 25 TH JUNE, 2019. FROM THE RECORD, IT WAS NOTI CED THAT EARLIER THE CA S E WAS ADJOURNED ON THE REQUEST OF THE LD. COUNSEL FOUR TIMES AT THE TIME OF HEARING . ON THE DATE OF LAST HEARING TAKEN PLACE, WE HAVE DECIDED TO PROCEED WITH THE HEARING OF THE CASE EX - PARTE WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE AND TH E MATERIAL PLACED ON RECORD. AT THE VERY OUTSET , OUR ATTENTION WAS BROUGHT TO THE FACT THAT THE IN STANT APPEAL FILED BY TH E ASSESSEE WAS TIME BARRED BY 82 DAYS. THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A) WAS COMMUNICATED TO THE ASSESSEE ON 21 - 1 1 - 20 17. THE APPEAL BEFORE THE T RIBUNAL WAS TO BE FILED WITHIN A PERIOD OF 60 DAYS. HOWEVER, THE SAME WAS FILED ON 12 TH APRIL, 2018. THEREAFTER, IT WAS BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE ASSESSEE VIDE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CUM NOTICE THAT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSSESSEE WAS TIME BARRED BY 82 DAYS AND IT WAS ALSO INFORMED THAT ASSSESSEE HAS NOT FILED CONDONATION PETITION. HOWEVER, TILL DATE OF LAST HEARING IN THIS CASE ON 25 TH JUNE, 2019 THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT FILED ANY APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE IN STANT APPEAL BY 82 DAYS. AFTER EXAMINATION OF THE ENTIRE MATERIAL, THE ASSESSEE COULD NOT BRING ON RECORD ANY EVIDENCE OR REASON TO DEMONSTRATE THAT HE WAS PREVENTED BY WHATSOEVER CIRCUMSTANCES OR THERE WAS SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR NOT FLING APP EAL IN TIME WH ICH WAS LATE BY 82 DAYS. ALTHOUGH AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 253(5) OF INCOME TAX ACT AN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AFTER THE EXPIRY OF STATUTORY PERIOD FROM THE DATE OF THE ORDER CAN BE ADMITTED IF THE ASSESSEE SATISFIED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS SUFFI CIENT CAUSE FOR NOT PRESENTING APPEAL WITHIN TIME. IN THE CASE OF RAMLAL VS. REVA COAL FIELDS LTD. [AIR 1962 (SC) 361], THE HON BLE SUPREME COURT HAVE HELD THAT CONDONATION IS NOT A MATTER OF RIGHT AND THERE HAS TO BE A REASONABLE CAUSE FOR THE SAME. I.T.A NO. 920 /AHD/20 18 A.Y. 2014 - 15 PAGE NO KIRANKUM AR J. MALA VS. ACIT 3 SIM ILARLY OBSERVATIONS WERE MADE BY THE HON BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF MADHU DADHA VS. ACIT (2014) 186 TAXMAN 88 (2009) 317 ITR 458. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE FACTS AND FINDING, THE QUESTION REGARDING WHETHER THERE IS A CAUSE OR NOT WHICH DEPENDS UPON E ACH CASE AND PRIMARILY IS A QUESTION OF FACT TO BE CONSIDERED TAKING INTO ACCOUNT TOTALITY OF EVENTS WHICH HAD TAKEN PLACE IN A PARTICULAR CASE. SINCE NO COGENT AND SATISFACTORY EXPLANATION HAS BEEN FURNISHED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR DELAY OF 82 DAYS IN FILING THE APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THEREFORE, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DELAY ED BEING TIME BARRED BY 82 DAYS, AND THE SAME IS DISMISSED 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PR ONOUNCED IN THE OPEN C OURT O N 27 - 06 - 201 9 SD/ - SD/ - ( SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAV A ) ( AMARJIT SINGH ) JUDICAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD : DATED 27 /06 /2019 / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: - 1. ASSESSEE 2. REVENUE 3. CONCERNED CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER/ , / ,