ITO,WARD-2, CUDDALORE V. M/SNLC HOWSICOS, NEYVELI

ITA 933/CHNY/2020

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 105 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6432 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 4 month(s) 4 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 20-03-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2016-2017
• Appeal Filed On: 15-11-2020
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Tax effect

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’ए’ Ɋायपीठ, चेɄई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI ŵी वी दुगाŊ राव Ɋाियक सद˟ एवं ŵी जी. मंजुनाथा, लेखा सद˟ के समƗ Before Shri V. Durga Rao, Judicial Member & Shri G. Manjunatha, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.933/Chny/2020 िनधाŊरण वषŊ/Assessment Year: 2016-17 The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2, Cuddalore. Vs. M/s. NLC Howsicos, Opposite Thermal Power Station-1, Neyveli, Cuddalore 607 807. [PAN:AAAAN2264Q] (अपीलाथŎ/Appellant) (ŮȑथŎ/Respondent) अपीलाथŎ की ओर से / Appellant by : Shri AR V. Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT ŮȑथŎ की ओर से/Respondent by : None सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing : 21.03.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 21.03.2022 आदेश /O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Puducherry, dated 27.08.2020 relevant to the assessment year 2016-17. 2. The appeal filed by the Revenue is delayed by 10 days, for which, the Income Tax Officer, Ward 2, Cuddalore has filed a petition in the form of an affidavit for condonation of the delay explaining the cause for the delay in filing the appeal and prayed that the delay may I.T.A. No. 933/Chny/20 2 be condoned and admitted the appeal for hearing. Against the submissions made in the affidavit by the Revenue, the assessee has not raised any serious objection. Consequently, since the Revenue was prevented by sufficient cause, the delay of 10 days in filing of the appeal stands condoned and admitted the appeal for adjudication. 3. None appeared or any adjournment petition filed on behalf of the assessee. Hence, we proceed to decide the appeal after hearing the ld. DR. 4. When the appeal was taken up for hearing, the Bench has observed that the tax effect in the appeal filed by the Revenue is less than the monetary limit of ₹.50,00,000/- fixed by the CBDT to file an appeal by the Revenue before the Tribunal as per the CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, dated 08.08.2019. The ld. DR fairly conceded the above observations of the Bench. Being so, the Revenue authorities are precluded from filing the appeal before the Tribunal, since the tax effect is less than ₹.50,00,000/- in this appeal. Thus, the appeal filed by the Revenue is liable to be dismissed as not maintainable. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed. However, the Department is at liberty to seek recall of the above order since, the ld. DR was not I.T.A. No. 933/Chny/20 3 sure about as to whether the issue raised in the appeal of the Revenue is not arising out of RAP objection as no specific ground was raised in the grounds of appeal. 5. In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced on 21 st March, 2022 at Chennai. Sd/- Sd/- (G. MANJUNATHA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (V. DURGA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER Chennai, Dated, 21.03.2022 Vm/- आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथŎ/Appellant, 2.ŮȑथŎ/ Respondent, 3. आयकर आयुƅ (अपील)/CIT(A), 4. आयकर आयुƅ/CIT, 5. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध/DR & 6. गाडŊ फाईल/GF.