IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 951/AHD/2016 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09) DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), AHMEDABAD 380 009. VS. SADBHAV ENGINEERING LTD., SADBHAV HOUSE, OPP. LOW GARDEN POLICE CHOWKY, ELLISBRIDGE, AHMEDABAD -380 006. [PAN NO. AADCS 0852 Q] (APPELLANT) .. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SHRI S. K. DEV, SR. D.R. RESPONDENT BY : SHRI TUSHAR P. HEMANI, A.R. DATE OF HEARING 21.08.2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 05.09.2019 O R D E R PER MS. MADHUMITA ROY JUDICIAL MEMBER: THE INSTANT APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29.07.2013 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - I, AHMEDABAD ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 28.03.2013 PASSED BY THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), AHMEDABAD UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S 153A OF THE IN COME TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED AS TO THE ACT) FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR ( A.Y.) 2008-09. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, IT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE LD.AR FOR THE ASSESSEE THAT APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS HIT BY RECENTLY ISSUED CBDT CIRCULAR NO.17 OF 2019 DATED 08/08/2019 REVISING THE PREVIOUS THRESHOLDS PERTAIN ING TO TAX EFFECTS. IT IS INTER ALIA - 2 - ITA NO.951/AHD/2016 DCIT VS. SADBHAV ENGINEERING LTD. ASST.YEAR 2008-09 NOTICED THAT THE CBDT VIDE INSTRUCTION NO. F. NO. 2 79/MISC/M-93/2018-ITJ DT. 20/08/2019 HAS OBSERVED THAT CIRCULAR NO.17/2019 DA TED 08/08/2019 RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF MONETARY LIMITS IS ALSO APPLICABLE T O ALL PENDING APPEALS. AS PER AFORESAID CIRCULAR READ WITH INSTRUCTIONS, ALL PEND ING APPEALS FILED BY REVENUE ARE LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS A MEASURE FOR REDUCING LITIGATIO N WHERE THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMIT WHICH IS NOW REVISED AT RS.50 LAKHS. IN THE INSTANT CASE, THE TAX EFFECT ON THE DISPUTED ISSUES RAISED BY THE REVENUE IS STATED TO BE NOT EXCEEDING RS.50 LAKHS AND THEREFORE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS REQUIRED TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 3. THE LEARNED DR FOR THE REVENUE FAIRLY ADMITTED T HE APPLICABILITY OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 17 OF 2019. ACCORDINGLY, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. HOWEVER, IT WILL BE OPEN TO THE REVE NUE TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL ON SHOWING INAPPLICABILITY OF THE AFORESAID CBDT CI RCULAR IN ANY MANNER. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 05/09/2019 SD/- SD/- ( PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA ) ( MS. MADHUMITA ROY ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 05/09/2019 PRITI YADAV, SR.PS - 3 - ITA NO.951/AHD/2016 DCIT VS. SADBHAV ENGINEERING LTD. ASST.YEAR 2008-09 / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. / CONCERNED CIT 4. ) ( / THE CIT(A)-I, AHMEDABAD. 5. , '#$$ / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. %& '( / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// / (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) !'# / ITAT, AHMEDABAD 1. DATE OF DICTATION 04.09.2019. 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER 04.09.2019 3. OTHER MEMBER. 4. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.P. S./P.S .. 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE D ICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR.P .S./P.S. 7. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK 8. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK ... 9. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.. 10. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER