IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH A: NEW DELHI BEFORE, SHRI G. S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBE I.T.A NO.960/DEL/2017 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08) ANUP SINGH S/O SH. MOOLA SINGH, VPO NOORWALA, DIST. PANIPAT-132 103 (HARYANAN) PAN-EXQPS 7894H VS. DY, CIT, CIRCLE-PANIPAT, HARYANA. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY MS. SOUMYA JAIN, CA RESPONDENT BY SH. PRAKASH DUBEY, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING 14.01.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 14.01 2021 ORDER PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM: THIS APPEAL IS PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST OR DER DATED 21.12.2016 PASSED BY THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), KARNAL {CIT(A)} FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08. 2.0 THE LD. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (AR) SUB MITS THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELATING T O THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER T HE DIRECT TAX 2 ITA NO.960/DEL/201 7 ANUP SINGH VS. DCIT VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020. IT HAS BEEN STATED THAT THE NECESSARY DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4 OF THE DIRE CT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. T HE LD. AR HAS PRAYED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. 3.0 CONSIDERING THE AFORESAID SITUATION, THE CAPTIONED APPEAL IS CONSIGNED TO THE RECORDS AND TREATED AS DISMISSED. 4.0 IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID, THE APPEAL IS CONSI GNED TO THE RECORDS AND, FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, IS TREATED AS DISMIS SED. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTU AL HEARING ON 14 TH JANUARY, 2021. SD/- SD/ - (G.S.PANNU) (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED:14/01/2021 PK/PS COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI