I.T.A. No. 975/Del/2020 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “H” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No. 975/Del/2020 िनधाᭅरणवषᭅ/Assessment Year: 2010-11 DCIT, Central Circle : 20, New Delhi. बनाम Vs. M/s. Weldon Polymers Pvt. Ltd., DSM 609 – 610, DLF Tower, Shivaji Marg, Moti Nagar, New Delhi – 110 015. PAN No. AAACW6549H अपीलाथᱮ/ Appellant ᮧ᭜यथᱮ/ Respondent िनधाᭅᳯरतीकᳱओरसे / Assessee by : Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Advocate; राज᭭वकᳱओरसे / Department by : Shri Sumit Kumar Verma, Sr. D. R.; सुनवाईकᳱतारीख/ Date of hearing : 05.01.2023 उ᳃ोषणाकᳱतारीख/Pronouncement on : 05.01.2023 आदेश / O R D E R PER C. N. PRASAD, J.M. 1. This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi [hereinafter I.T.A. No. 975/Del/2020 2 referred to CIT (Appeals)] dated 06.12.2019 for the Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. At the time of hearing, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that tax effect involved in this appeal is below the prescribed limit of Rs.50 lakhs, as fixed by the CBDT and requested to dismiss the Revenue’s appeal on account of low tax effect. 3. Perusal of the aforesaid appeal filed by the Revenue apparently show that the same is having low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 8 th August, 2019 vide which the Revenue has been directed not to prefer any appeal in case the tax effect is less than Rs.50,00,000/- and this factual position has been fairly conceded by the learned Senior Departmental Representative. 4. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. Perusal of CBDT Circular (supra) shows that monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Department before the Tribunal, Hon'ble High Court and Hon'ble Supreme Court has been revised. In view of the CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 8 th August, 2019 having retrospective effect as coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in case of Dinesh Madhavlal Patel [TS- 469-ITAT-2019(Ahd)] 2019-TIOL-1556-ITAT-AHM dated 14 th August, 2019 has already decided the issue as to the applicability of the captioned circular to the pending appeals in affirmative and what has been discussed above, we are of the considered view that the aforesaid appeal is not maintainable because of low tax effect i.e. less than Rs.50,00,000/- hence, the aforesaid appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed having been become infructuous. However, in case, the present appeal is found to be maintainable at any stage for any I.T.A. No. 975/Del/2020 3 technical reasons, the Department shall be at liberty to seek recall of this order under relevant provisions of law. 5. In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue, is dismissed being infructuous. Order pronounced in the open court on : 05/01/2023 Sd/- Sd/- ( B. R. R. KUMAR ) ( C. N. PRASAD ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated : 05/01/2023 *MEHTA* Copy forwarded to :- 1. Appellant; 2. Respondent; 3. CIT 4. CIT (Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi. Date of dictation 05.01.2023 Date on which the typed draft is placed before the dictating member 05.01.2023 Date on which the typed draft is placed before the other member 05.01.2023 Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr. PS/ PS 05.01.2023 Date on which the fair order is placed before the dictating member for pronouncement 05.01.2023 I.T.A. No. 975/Del/2020 4 Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr. PS/ PS 05.01.2023 Date on which the final order is uploaded on the website of ITAT 05.01.2023 Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk 05.01.2023 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk The date on which the file goes to the Assistant Registrar for signature on the order Date of dispatch of the order