Late Sh. Krishan Kumar Mittal Through Legal Hair Smt. Kamlesh Mittal , Delhi V. ACIT Central Circle-20, Delhi

ITA 982/DEL/2022

AI Insights

This case involves an appeal by the legal heir of Late Sh. Krishan Kumar Mittal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -27, New Delhi, for the assessment year 2018-19. The appeal was initially filed due to an assessment order, but it was later found that the Commissioner had granted full relief to the appellant by quashing the assessment order. Consequently, the appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal, which was granted by the Tribunal.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 300718 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 6 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-05-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2023
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Appeal Filed On: 09-05-2022
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ASSESSEE IS; SAPNA BHATI

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘H’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.982/Del/2022 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Late Sh. Krishan Kumar Mittal Through Legal Heir Smt. Kamlesh Mittal, A-23/1, Lawrence Road Industrial Area, Keshav Puram, North West Delhi Delhi Vs. DCIT/ACIT, Central Circle-20, Delhi PAN :AAIPM0365J (Appellant) (Respondent) ORDER PER SAKTIJIT DEY, JM: This is an appeal by the assessee against order dated 14.03.2022 of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -27, New Delhi, for the assessment year 2018-19. 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that the appeal was wrongly filed as learned Commissioner (Appeals) has essentially granted full relief to the Appellant by Sh. Neeraj Mangla, CA Respondent by Ms. Sapna Bhati, CIT (DR) Date of hearing 16.05.2023 Date of pronouncement 16.05.2023 ITA No.982/Del/2022 AY: 2018-19 2 | P a g e assessee by quashing the assessment order. Thus, on instructions, he sought permission to withdraw the appeal. A letter to this effect furnished by learned counsel for assessee is kept on record. 3. Learned Departmental Representative has no objection to withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee. 4. Considering the above, we permit the assessee to withdraw the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. In the result, appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 16 th May, 2023 Sd/- Sd/- (G.S. PANNU) (SAKTIJIT DEY) PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 16 th May, 2023. RK/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi