, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL I BENCH, M UMBAI BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.MITTAL,(JM) AND N.K.BILLAIYA (AM) . . , . ! . '#$ , !% ! & ./I.T.A. NO.997/M/2011 ( ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR:2008-09) ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST CHURCH, JAMBLI NAKA, THANE / VS. CIT-II, 9 TH FLOOR, VARDAAN MIDC, WAGLE ESTATE, THANE ) !% ./ *+ ./PAN/GIR NO. : AAATS 8786 M ( ), / APPELLANT) .. ( -.), / RESPONDENT) ), / ! / APPELLANT BY : SHRI KETAN S PATEL -.), 0 / ! /RESPONDENT BY : SHRI P.K.SHUKLA 0 1% / DATE OF HEARING : 9.5.2013 23( 0 1% /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 9.5.2013 !4 / O R D E R PER B.R.MITTAL, JM: THE ASSESEE HAS FILED THIS APPEAL FOR ASSESSMENT Y EAR 2008-09 AGAINST ORDER PASSED BY ITO (HQ)(TECH) FOR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II,THANE FOR NON CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING OF FORM NO.10 UNDER INCOME TAX RULES, 1962 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, LD A.R. CONCEDED THAT NO APPEAL LIE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AGAISNT ABOVE ORDER. HENCE, HE REQUESTED TO WITHDR AW THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. LD D.R. HAS NO OBJECTION TO ACCEPT THE P RAYER OF THE ASSESSEE. 3. IN VIEW OF THIS, WE ACCEDE TO THE REQUEST OF LD A.R. AND ALLOW TO WITHDRAW ITS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED B Y ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN. 2 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE IS DISMI SSED. 5 16 51 0 %5* 0 *1 7# ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 9 TH MAY, 2013 . !4 0 23( %! 8 9 6 9 TH MAY, 2013 3 0 : SD/- SD/- ( . ! . '#$/N.K.BILLAIYA ) ( . . /B.R.MITTAL) !% / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI; 9 DATED 9 / 05/2012 . . ./ PARIDA , SR. PS !4 !4 !4 !4 0 00 0 -1D -1D -1D -1D E!D(1 E!D(1 E!D(1 E!D(1 / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. ), / THE APPELLANT 2. -.), / THE RESPONDENT. 3. F ( ) / THE CIT(A)- 4. F / CIT 5. DG: -1 , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. :H I / GUARD FILE. !4 / BY ORDER, .D1 .D1 .D1 .D1 -1 -1-1 -1 //TRUE COPY// 7 * (ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , /ITAT, MUMBAI