IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD C BENCH AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, AND SHRI S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER. IT(SS)A NO. 366/AHD/2014 (ASSESSMENT YEAR:2003-04) GIRISH JYANTILAL PATEL C-62, WEST END PARK, B/H. GURUDWARA, THALTEJ, AHMEDABAD 380060 APPELLANT VS. I.T.O., WARD-1(1), AHMDEABAD RESPONDENT PAN: AGPPP6709C /BY ASSESSEE : NONE /BY REVENUE : MR. RAJESH MEENA, SR. D.R. /DATE OF HEARING : 24.05.2017 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 24.05.2017 ORDER PER S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS ASSESSEES APPEAL FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2003-04 ARISES FROM THE CIT(A)-III, AHMEDABADS ORDER DATED 24.09.2014, PAS SED IN CASE NO. CIT(A)- III/480/ITO-WD-1(1)/13-14, IN PROCEEDINGS U/S. 271( 1)(C) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961; IN SHORT THE ACT. 2. CASE CALLED TWICE. NONE PRESENT AT ASSESSEES B EHEST DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE REGISTRY HAD SENT AN RPAD NOTICE DATED 20. 04.2017 FORMING PART OF THE CASE FILE WHICH HAS BEEN RECEIVED BACK UNSERVED BY THE POSTAL AUTHORITIES. THIS PRIMA FACIE SHOWS THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERES TED IN PROSECUTING THIS IT(SS)A NO. 366/AHD/2014 (GIRISH JAYANTILAL PATEL VS. ITO) A.Y. 2003-04 - 2 - APPEAL. IN VIEW OF THESE FACTS, IT IS CLEAR THAT T HE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL, AND ACCORDINGLY, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE MULTIPLAN (INDIA) (P) LTD., (38 ITD 320), WE DISMIS S THIS APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. THIS ASSESSEES APPEAL IS ACCORDINGLY DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. [PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS THE 24 TH DAY OF MAY, 2017.] SD/- SD/- ( PRAMOD KUMAR ) (S. S. GODA RA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 24/05/2017 TRUE COPY S.K.SINHA / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- / REVENUE 2 / ASSESSEE ! / CONCERNED CIT 4 !- / CIT (A) ( )*+ ,--. . /0 / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 1 +23 45 / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / . // . /0