IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI F BEN CH, NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, AND MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(SS) NO.135/DEL/2003 BLOCK PERIOD 01.04.1987 TO 03.09.1997 SHRI P RADEEP JOLLY, S-23, GREATER KAILASH-II, NEW DELHI JCIT SPL. RANGE-20, NEW DELHI PAN - AACPJ8897J APPELLANT RESPONDENT IT(SS) NO.239/DEL/2003 BLOCK PERIOD 01.04.1987 TO 03.09.1997 SMT. KRISHNA JOLLY, S-519, G.K. II, DELHI-110048 JCIT SPL. RANGE-20, NEW DELHI PAN - AALPJ5930B APPELLANT RESPONDENT IT(SS) NO.377/DEL/2003 BLOCK PERIOD 01.04.1987 TO 03.09.1997 MRS. KRISHNA JOLLY (WIFE - LEGAL HEIR), LATE K.L. JOLLY, S-23, G.K-II, NEW DELHI JCIT SPL. RANGE-20, NEW DELHI PAN - AALPJ5930B APPELLANT RES PONDENT APPELLANT BY SHRI RAJ KUMAR, CA & SHRI SACHI JAIN, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT BY SMT. SUSHMA SINGH, CIT - DR DATE OF HEARING 06 .01.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 06 .01.2021 2 ITA NO.135/DEL/2003 & ORS. ORDER PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, THESE THREE APPEALS BY THE DIFFERENT ASSESSEES ARE PREFERRED AGAINST THE ORDERS OF THE CIT(A)-XV, NEW DELHI, DATED 10.01.2003, 28.0 2.2003 & 19.05.2003 RESPECTIVELY PERTAINING TO BLOCK PERIOD OF 01.04.1987 TO 03.09.1 997. 2. AT THE VERY OUTSET, THE COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE STATED THAT THE APPELLANTS WANT TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS AS THEY HAVE MOVED APPLICAT IONS UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020 TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE. ON SUCH CONCESS ION, THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 3. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEES ARE GIVEN LIBERTY TO APPR OACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR REVIVAL OF THE APPEALS IF FOR SOME TECHNICAL REASON, THE DISPU TE COULD NOT BE SETTLED UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. DECISIONS ANNOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT IN THE PRESEN CE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF BOTH THE SIDES ON 06/01/2021. SD/- SD/- [SUCHITRA KAMBLE] [N.K. BILLAIYA] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DELHI; DATED: 06/01/2021. F{X~{T? F{X~{T? F{X~{T? F{X~{T? FA FA FA FA P.S P.SP.S P.S COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR ASST. REGISTRAR, ITAT, NEW DELHI