JSW INDUSTRIAL GASES LIMITED,MUMBAI V. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 4(3)(1), BENGALURU, BENGALURU

ITA 1382/BANG/2025

AI Insights

JSW Industrial Gases Limited appealed against the order of the CIT(A)/NFAC which confirmed the disallowance of a deduction claimed under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The deduction was for a donation of Rs.1,00,00,000 made to the PM Cares Fund, which the company had claimed as part of its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditures. The Assessing Officer had initially disallowed the deduction, and the CIT(A) upheld this decision, citing the 'Doctrine of Per Incuriam'. The Tribunal, however, found that the disallowance was not in line with the precedents and the specific provisions of the Income Tax Act, particularly in light of the mandatory nature of CSR expenditures under the Companies Act, 2013 and the conditions specified under section 80G for claiming deductions for donations.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 775280 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 23 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-09-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2020-2021
• Appeal Filed On: 18-06-2025
• Other Referred Cases: M/s. Peak XV Partners Advisors Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore in ITA No.2045 & 2046/Bang/2024, Allegis Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT in ITA No.1693/Bang/2019
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: BALUSAMY N.
• Assessee Lawyers: VINITA SHAH
• Keywords: Set aside; Business income; Depreciation; Ineligible deduction
• Section: 143(3); 142(1); 32; 37; 6; 37(1); 80G

Judgement Text

"ITA No.1382/Bang/2024 JSW Industrial Gases Limited, Mumbai IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1382/Bang/2025 Assessment Year: 2020-21 JSW Industrial Gases Limited JSW Centre Bandra Kurla Complex Bandra (East) Mumbai 400 051 PAN NO : AAACJ5037F Vs. DCIT Circle-4(3)(1) Bangalore APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Ms. Vinita Shah, A.R. Respondent by : Sri Balusamy N., D.R. Date of Hearing : 09.09.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 10.09.2025 O R D E R PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)/NFAC dated 30.4.2025 vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/250/2025-26/1076897534(1) passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”) for the assessment year 2020-21. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. “On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as in law, the ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of the ld. Assessing Officer in disallowing the deduction claimed u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 amounting to Rs.1,00,00,000/-, without considering the facts and circumstances of the case and law. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as in law, the ld. CIT(A) as well as the ld. AO has erred in not appreciating the fact that the donation was given to PM Cares Fund and jurisdictional decisions of the Hon’ble ITAT in respect of allowance of CSR expenses as deduction u/s 80G. Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1382/Bang/2024 JSW Industrial Gases Limited, Mumbai Page 2 of 8 3. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter or delete the said ground of appeal.” 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of industrial gases. The assessee company filed its return of income for the assessment year 2020-21 on 30.12.2020 declaring total income of Rs.63,79,50,730/-. Subsequently, the case of the assessee company was selected for scrutiny assessment under the e-Assessment Scheme, 2021 on the issue of “deduction from total income under Chapter-VIA”. Thereafter, notices u/s 143(2) as well as 142(1) of the Act were issued from time to time and the assessee had filed its E- submission electronically. 3.1 The AO on perusal of the Profit & Loss account and computation of total income and details submitted by the assessee, found that the assessee has debited an amount of Rs.1,00,00,000/- towards Corporate Social Responsibility (“CSR”) expenditure in profit & loss account and added back the same in the statement of total income u/s 37 of the Act while computing the taxable income. The assessee company had, however, claimed 100% of such CSR expenses amounting to Rs.1,00,00,000/- u/s 80G of the Act which was paid as donation to PM Cares Fund. The AO rejected the claim of deduction u/s 80G of the Act and accordingly assessed on a total income of Rs.64,79,50,730/-. 4. Aggrieved by the order of AO passed u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 23.9.2022, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC. 5. The ld. CIT(A)/NFAC dismissed the appeal of the assessee holding that by invoking the “Doctrine of Per Incuriam” that the doctrine of Stare decisis of the referred judgements by the assessee Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1382/Bang/2024 JSW Industrial Gases Limited, Mumbai Page 3 of 8 is not applicable in the present case and accordingly disallowance u/s 80G of the Act was upheld. 6. Again aggrieved by the order of ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, the assessee filed the present appeal before this Tribunal. 7. Before us, ld. A.R. of the assessee vehemently submitted that the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC erred in confirming the action of the AO in disallowing the deduction claimed u/s 80G of the Act amounting to Rs.1,00,00,000/- to the PM Cares Fund. Further, ld. A.R. submitted that various decisions of Benches of this Tribunal are covered in favour of the assessee and accordingly prayed to allow the claim of deduction as made u/s 80G of the Act. 8. The ld. D.R. on the other hand, relied on the orders of the authorities below. 9. The solitary issue that is raised whether the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC is justified in rejecting the claim of deduction u/s 80G of the Act for donations/contributions made towards its corporate social responsibility especially when the assessee company suo-motto disallowed the claim of expenditure U/s 37 of the Act. 10. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. It is an undisputed fact that the assessee company had made donation amounting to Rs.1,00,00,000/- to PM Cares Fund. Further, it is also an undisputed fact that the said donation of Rs.1,00,00,000/- is made towards the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), in line with the guidelines issued under the Companies Act, 2013. The assessee has debited an amount of Rs.1,00,00,000/- towards Corporate Social Responsibility (“CSR”) expenditure in profit & loss account and added Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1382/Bang/2024 JSW Industrial Gases Limited, Mumbai Page 4 of 8 back the same in the statement of total income u/s 37 of the Act while computing the taxable income. The contention of the AO is that the assessee has claimed the donation both under CSR and u/s 80G of the Act and it is not a voluntary donation but a legal obligation. 10.1 In the similar facts and circumstances, the coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of M/s. Peak XV Partners Advisors Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore in ITA No.2045 & 2046/Bang/2024 vide order dated 3.3.2025 held as under: “5.1 As can be seen above, the existing approval u/s 80G(5)(vi) of the Act expiring on or after 1st October, 2009 shall be deemed to have been extended in perpetuity unless specifically withdrawn. Further, any new approval obtained u/s 80G(5) of the Act on or after 1.10.2009 would be a onetime approval, which would be valid till it is withdrawn. Therefore, in view of the above circular, we are of the opinion that this ground of the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC is not tenable. 5.2 Further, we take a note of the fact that section 37(1) of the Act pertains solely to the computation of income from business or profession and its scope is confined to allowing or disallowing expenditure incurred for business purposes. On the other hand, section 80G of the Act provides deduction for donation made to specified funds and institutions while computing the taxable income of the assessee. The disallowance of CSR expenditure under explanation 2 to section 37(1) of the Act applies only in the context of determining its income from business and does not preclude an assessee from claiming deduction under Chapter VIA (which includes section 80G) for eligible donation. 5.3 While CSR expenditure is mandatory u/s 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, the assessee retains discretion over the recipients of such contributions. When such contributions are made to approved institutions or fund u/s 80G of the Act, they qualify as donation “for the purpose of that section, even if incurred under a statutory obligation”. The term “donation” u/s 80G of the Act includes both voluntary contributions and mandatory payments made to specified entities. The mandatory nature of CSR expenditure does not dilute its eligibility for deduction u/s 80G of the Act, as the deduction depends on the nature of recipient and compliance of the conditions specified u/s 80G of the Act. 5.4 We also note that the coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of Allegis Services (Inia) Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT in ITA No.1693/Bang/2019 dated 29.4.2020 held as under: “10. Section 135 of Companies Act, 2013 requires companies with CSR obligations, with effect from 01/04/2014. Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1382/Bang/2024 JSW Industrial Gases Limited, Mumbai Page 5 of 8 Finance (No.2) Act, 2014 inserted new Explanation 2 to subsection (1) of section 37, so as to clarify that for purposes of subsection (1) of section 37, any expenditure incurred by an assessee on the activities relating to corporate social responsibility referred to in section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 shall not be deemed to be an expenditure incurred by the assessee for the purposes of the business or profession. 11. This amendment will take effect from 1/04/2015 and will, accordingly, apply to assessment year 2015-16 and subsequent years. 12. Thus, CSR expenditure is to be disallowed by new Explanation 2 to section 37(1), while computing Income under the Head ‘Income form Business and Profession’. Further, clarification regarding impact of Explanation 2 to section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act in Explanatory Memorandum to The Finance (No.2) Bill, 2014 is as under: \"The existing provisions of section 37(1) of the Act provide that deduction for any expenditure, which is not mentioned specifically in section 30 to section 36 of the Act, shall be allowed if the same is incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of carrying on business or profession. As the CSR expenditure (being an application of income) is not incurred for the purposes of carrying on business, such expenditure cannot be allowed under the existing provisions of section 37 of the Income-tax Act. Therefore, in order to provide certainty on this issue, it is proposed to clarify that for the purposes of section 37(1) any expenditure incurred by an assessee on the activities relating to corporate social responsibility referred to in section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 shall not be deemed to have been incurred for the purpose of business and, hence, shall not be allowed as deduction under section 37. However, the CSR expenditure which is of the nature described in section 30 to section 36 of the Act shall be allowed deduction under those sections subject to fulfilment of conditions, if any, specified therein.\" 13. From the above it is clear that under Income tax Act, certain provisions explicitly state that deductions for expenditure would be allowed while computing income under the head, ‘Income from Business and Profession” to those, who pursue corporate social responsibility projects under following sections. • Section 30 provides deduction on repairs, municipal tax and insurance premiums. • Section 31, provides deduction on repairs and insurance of plant, machinery and furniture • Section 32 provides for depreciation on tangible assets like building, machinery, plant, furniture and also on intangible assets like know-how, patents, trademarks, licenses. Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1382/Bang/2024 JSW Industrial Gases Limited, Mumbai Page 6 of 8 • Section 33 allows development rebate on machinery, plants and ships. • Section 34 states conditions for depreciation and development rebate. • Section 35 grants deduction on expenditure for scientific research and knowledge extension in natural and applied sciences under agriculture, animal husbandry and fisheries. Payment to approved universities/research institutions or company also qualifies for deduction. In-house R&D is eligible for deduction, under this section. • Section 35CCD provides deduction for skill development projects, which constitute the flagship mission of the present Government. • Section 36 provides deduction regarding insurance premium on stock, health of employees, loans or commission for employees, interest on borrowed capital, employer contribution to provident fund, gratuity and payment of security transaction tax. Income Tax Act, under section 80G, forming part of Chapter VIA, provides for deductions for computing taxable income as under: • Section 80G(2) provides for sums expended by an assessee as donations against which deduction is available. a) Certain donations, give 100% deduction, without any qualifying limit like Prime Minister's National Relief Fund, National Defense Fund, National Illness Assistance Fund etc., specified under section 80G(1)(i) b) Donations with 50% deduction are also available under Section 80G for all those sums that do not fall under section 80G(1)(i). Under Section 80G(2) (iiihk) and (iiihl) there are specific exclusion of certain payments, that are part of CSR responsibility, not eligible for deduction u/s80G. 14. In our view, expenditure incurred under section 30 to 36 are claimed while computing income under the head, ‘Income form Business and Profession”, whereas monies spent under section 80G are claimed while computing “Total Taxable income” in the hands of assessee. The point of claim under these provisions are different. 15. Further, intention of legislature is very clear and unambiguous, since expenditure incurred under section 30 to 36 are excluded from Explanation 2 to section 37(1) of the Act, they are specifically excluded in clarification issued. There is no restriction on an expenditure being claimed under above sections to be exempt, as long as it satisfies necessary conditions under section 30 to 36 of the Act, for computing income under the head, “Income from Business and Profession”. 16. For claiming benefit under section 80G, deductions are considered at the stage of computing “Total taxable income”. Even if any payments under section 80G forms part of CSR payments (keeping in mind ineligible deduction expressly provided u/s.80G), the same would already stand excluded while computing, Income Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1382/Bang/2024 JSW Industrial Gases Limited, Mumbai Page 7 of 8 under the head, “Income form Business and Profession”. The effect of such disallowance would lead to increase in Business income. Thereafter benefit accruing to assessee under Chapter VIA for computing “Total Taxable Income” cannot be denied to assessee, subject to fulfillment of necessary conditions therein. 17. We therefore do not agree with arguments advanced by Ld. Sr. DR. 18. In present facts of case, Ld.AR submitted that all payments forming part of CSR does not form part of profit and loss account for computing Income under the head, “Income from Business and Profession”. It has been submitted that some payments forming part of CSR were claimed as deduction under section 80G of the Act, for computing “Total taxable income”, which has been disallowed by authorities below. In our view, assessee cannot be denied the benefit of claim under Chapter VI A, which is considered for computing ‘Total Taxable Income”. If assessee is denied this benefit, merely because such payment forms part of CSR, would lead to double disallowance, which is not the intention of Legislature. 19. On the basis of above discussion, in our view, authorities below have erred in denying claim of assessee under section 80G of the Act. We also note that authorities below have not verified nature of payments qualifying exemption under section 80G of the Act and quantum of eligibility as per section 80G(1) of the Act. 20. Under such circumstances, we are remitting the issue back to Ld.AO for verifying conditions necessary to claim deduction under section 80G of the Act. Assessee is directed to file all requisite details in order to substantiate its claim before Ld.AO. Ld.AO is then directed to grant deduction to the extent of eligibility. Accordingly grounds raised by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes. In the result appeal filed by assessee stands allowed.” 5.5 In view of the above elaborated discussion and following findings of the coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the above-mentioned case, we hereby set aside the orders of ld. AO and direct him to delete the addition made in both these assessment years. Hence, the grounds of appeal of the assessee in both these years are allowed.” 10.2 In view of the above decision of the Tribunal, we hereby set aside the order of the AO and direct him to grant deduction as claimed u/s 80G of the Act. Hence, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed. Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1382/Bang/2024 JSW Industrial Gases Limited, Mumbai Page 8 of 8 11. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 10th Sept, 2025 Sd/- (Prashant Maharishi) Vice President Sd/- (Keshav Dubey) Judicial Member Bangalore, Dated 10th Sept, 2025. VG/SPS Copy to: 1. The Applicant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The DR, ITAT, Bangalore. 5 Guard file By order Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Bangalore. Printed from counselvise.com "