Kailash Chand Maheshwari, Kanpur V. Income Tax Officer-2(2), Kanpur

MA 100/LKW/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 124 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3672 (ITAT-LUCKNOW)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 18 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 21-10-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 02-09-2015
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: PRADEEP SETH

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH A, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI. A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M.A. NO. 100/LKW/2015 (IN ITA NO. 280 /LKW/201 5 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2007-08 KAILASH CHAND MAHE SWARI 75/232, IST FLOOR BHANDARI BUILDING, KANPUR V. INCOME TAX OFFICER 2(2) KANPUR PAN : ACNPM 1531 F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APP ELL ANT BY: SHRI PRADEEP SETH, CA RESPONDENT BY: SHRI AMIT NIGAM , D.R. DATE OF HEARING: 16 10 201 5 DATE OF PRONOUNCEME NT: 21 10 2015 O R D E R PER SUNIL KUMAR YADAV: THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION IS PREFERRED AGAINS T THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 16.06.2015, DISMISSING THE APPEA L OF THE ASSESSEE. THROUGH THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION, ASSESSEE HA S EXPLAINED HIS ABSENCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING ON ACCOUNT OF WHICH THE APPEAL WAS HEARD AND DISPOSED OF EX-PARTE. THE REASONS FOR HIS ABSENCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING ARE DULY EXPLAINED IN THE MISCELLAN EOUS APPLICATION. 2. BEING CONVINCED WITH EXPLANATION FURNISHED IN TH E MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION, WE RECALL THE ORDER DATED 16.06.2015 A ND DIRECT THE REGISTRY TO REFIX THIS APPEAL FOR HEARING ON 26.11. 2015. :-2-: 3. IN THE RESULT, M.A. OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED. ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE DAT E MENTIONED ON THE CAPTIONED PAGE. SD/ - SD/ - [ A. K. GARODIA ] [ S UNIL KUMAR Y ADAV ] ACCOUNTANT M EMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED 21 ST OCTOBER, 2015 AKS COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR