, ,L ,L,L ,L- -- -,E ,E,E ,E- -- -LH LHLH LH IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD . . , , BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER MA NO.126/AHD/2017 (ITA NO.1151/AHD/2013) (ASSESSMENT YEAR :2009-10) SMT. URMILABEN J. JADAV 78, SARTHI BUNGLOWS, AHMEDABAD MEHSANA HIGHWAY, CHANDKHEDA, AHMEDABAD / VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4, GANDHINAGAR. ! ./ '#$# ./ PAN/GIR NO. : ADYPJ 7990 B ( %&!' / APPELLANT ) .. ( (!' / RESPONDENT ) %&!' ) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI A.C. BRAHMKSHATRIYA, AR (!' * ) / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI V. K. SINGH, SR. DR + , * -. / DATE OF HEARING 01/12/2017 /012 * -. / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 19/12/2017 # 3 / O R D E R PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER : BY THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION, THE APPELLANT/A SSESSEE HAS REQUESTED FOR RECALLING/RECTIFYING THE ORDER DATED 28/02/2017 PASSED BY THE ITAT, AHMEDABAD BENCH IN ITA NO.1151/AHD/2017 F OR ASSESSMENT YEAR (A.Y.) 2009-10. 2. WE HAVE HEARD THE PARTIES. MA NO.126 /AHD/2017(IN ITA NO.1151/AHD/2013) SMT. URMILABEN J. JADAV VS. ITO A.Y. 2009-10 - 2 - 3. IN THIS MISC. APPLICATION, APPLICANT HAS RAISED CERTAIN OBJECTION WITH REGARD TO FACTS OF THE CASE AND ALSO STATED TH AT APPEAL FILED BY HIM HAS NOT BEEN CONSIDERED IN DETAIL BY THE BENCH. 4. WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE MISC. APPLICATION BUT W E DO NOT FIND ANY APPARENT MISTAKE FROM THE RECORD. WE HAVE PASSE D DETAILED ORDER THEREFORE, MISC. APPLICATION IS DISMISSED. 5. IN THE RESULT, MISC. APPLICATION FILED BY THE AS SESSEE IS DISMISSED. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 19 /12 /201 7 SD/- SD/- . . ( ) ( ) ( N.K. BILLAIYA ) ( MAHAVIR PRASAD ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 19/12/2017 ! ' / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. %&!' / THE APPELLANT 2. (!' / THE RESPONDENT. 3. 67- # # + 8- / CONCERNED CIT 4. # # + 8- (%&) / THE CIT(A) 5. 9:; -67 , # %&. %672 , % / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. ;< =, / GUARD FILE. # $ / BY ORDER, (9&- - //TRUE COPY// %/$ &' ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD