SHRI DILIP BAID, Jaipur V. ACIT, Jaipur

MA 14/JPR/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 124 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3243 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 2 month(s) 23 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 26-06-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2003-2004
• Appeal Filed On: 03-04-2012
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: NEENA JEPH JCIT DHK
• Keywords: Rectification of order
• Section: 2

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR JH VKJ-IH-RKSYKUH] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH VH-VKJ-EHUK] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI R.P. TOLANI, JM & SHRI T.R. MEENA, AM M.A. NOS.. 14 & 15/JP/2012 (ARISING OUT OF VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NOS. 654 & 655/JP/2006) FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2003-04 & 2004-05 SHRI DILIP BAID 618, MAHAVEER NAGAR JAIPUR CUKE VS. THE ACIT CIRCLE- 6 JAIPUR LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO .: AAWPB 2062 M VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : WRITTEN SUBMISSION JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY :SMT. NEENA JEPH, JCIT LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 29/05/2015 ?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 26/06/2015 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER R.P. TOLANI, JM BOTH THESE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN FI LED BY THE ASSESSEE ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DATED 31 -03-2008 U/S 254(2) OF THE ACT PRAYING FOR RECTIFICATION OF MISTAKES U/S 2 54(2). 2.1 NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING EXCEPT FILING THE WRITTEN SUBMISSION. 2.2 WE HAVE HEARD THE LD. DR AND PERUSED THE MATERI ALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD. FROM THE RECORDS, WE FIND THAT BOTH THE APP EALS WERE WITHDRAWN M.A. NO. 14/JP/2012 SHRI DILIP BAID VS. ACIT, CIRCLE- 6, JAIPUR . 2 BY THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE AND THIS BENCH OF ITAT PASSED THE IMPUGNED ORDER ON 31-03-2008 BASED ON THE REQUEST O F THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE. THUS BY CONSIDERING ALL THESE FACTS A ND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, WE FIND THAT THERE IS NO MISTAKE ARISES OUT OF THIS IMPUGNED ORDER AND IT IS AT ALL NOT RECTIFIABLE U/S 254(2) OF THE ACT. THEREFORE, BOTH THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISM ISSED. 3.0 IN THE RESULT, THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS O F THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED. SD/- SD/- VH-VKJ-EHUK VKJ-IH-RKSYKUH (T.R. MEENA) (R.P.TOLANI) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 26/06/2015 *MISHRA VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI DILIP BAID, JAIPUR 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- THE ACIT, CIRCLE- 6, JAIPUR 3. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY@ THE CIT(A). 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ THE CIT 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE (MA NO.14/JP/2012) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR