IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI BEFORE SHRI NARENDRA S. SAINI, HONBLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, HONBLE JUDICIAL MEMBER M A NO 15 /PAN/2015 : (ASST. YEAR : 2007 - 08 ) (ARISING OUT OF ITA 215 /PNJ/2014 , A.Y. 2007 - 08 ) ACIT , CIRCLE - 1 , VS. M/S GEETANJALI , BELGAUM . 2206, KACHERI GALLI , SHAHAPUR, BELGAUM . PAN : AAFFG6642P (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELL ANT BY : SHRI ANAND S. MARATHA , LD. D.R. RESPONDE NT BY : (WRITTEN SUBMISSION) DATE OF HEARING : 22 /07/2016 DATE OF ORDER : 22 /07/2016 O R D E R PER NARENDRA S. SAINI - A M : THIS IS MA FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL IN ITA. NO . ITA 215 /PNJ/2014 , DATED 01/10 /2014 FOR A. Y. 2007 - 08. SHRI ANAND S MARATHE WAS P RESENT ON BEHALF OF THE REVENUE AND ASSESSEE COUNSEL FILED WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. IT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE LD. DR ON BEHALF OF THE REVENUE THAT HE VEHEMENTLY SUPPORTED THE MA FILED BY THE REVENUE. THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE HAD BEEN DISMISSED WITHOUT GRANTING T HE REVENUE THE LIBERTY TO REQUEST FOR RECALL OF THE APPEA L I N THE EVENT THE ISSUE OF TAX EFFECT IS REVERSED. I N THE WRITTEN SUBMISSION THE A SSESSEE SUPPORTED THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL. IT WAS THE SUBMISSION THAT NO ERROR HAD BEEN POINTED OUT FROM THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL WHICH WAS APPARENT FROM THE RECORD. - 2 - WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE RIVAL SUBMISSION S. AS THE REVENUE HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO POIN T OUT ANY SPECIFIC ERROR IN THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL WHICH IS APPARENT FROM THE RECORD , WE ARE NOT INCLINED TO INTERFERE WITH THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL. IN THE RESULT THE MA FILED BY THE REVENUE STANDS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 22 .07 .2016. SD/ - ( GEORGE MATHAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER SD/ - (NARENDRA S. SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PLACE : PANAJI - GOA DATED : 22/07 /2016 *NANU * COPY TO : (1) APPELLANT (2) RESPONDENT (3) CIT CONCERNED (4) CIT(A) CONCERNED (5) D.R (6) GUARD FILE TRUE COPY, BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI