IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
MA No.155/M/2024
(Arising out of ITA No.2227/M/2023)
Assessment Year: 2020-21
CIT(A),
National Faceless Appeal Centre
(NFAC),
Income Tax Department,
Delhi – 110 001
Vs.
M/s. Blue Rose
Industrial Premises
Co-op Society Limited,
43 Blue Rose Industrial
Premises Co-op Society
Limited,
Western Express
Highway,
Borvali East,
Mumbai – 400 068
PAN: AAAAB3779Q
(Appellant) (Respondent)
Present for:
Assessee by : Shri Ajay R. Singh, A.R.
Revenue by : Shri H.M Bhatt, Sr. DR.
Date of Hearing : 26 . 07 . 2024
Date of Pronouncement : 19 . 08 . 2024
O R D E R
Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member:
At the outset, my attention was drawn by the Ld. Counsel
Shri Ajay R. Singh and not refuted by the Ld. Sr. D.R. Shri H.M.
Bhatt that on the appeal portal of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
only the authorization memo dated 20.06.2024 issued by the Pr.
MA No.155/M/2024
(Arising out of ITA No.2227/M/2023)
M/s. Blue Rose Industrial Premises Co-op Society Limited
2
Commissioner of Income Tax-42, Mumbai and forwarding letter
dated 21.06.2024 addressed to the Registrar, ITAT by the
Upendra Kumar, ITO-42(1)(1), Mumbai are available and in fact
no miscellaneous application u/s 254(2) of the Act is available on
online appeal portal.
2. From the details available qua instant MA, on the online
appeal portal of the Tribunal, it appears that the Registry of
Tribunal may be inadvertently entertained the authorization
memo dated 20.06.2024 as rectification application filed with a
delay of 51 days, against the order dated 31.10.2023 passed by
the co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the Assessee’s case (ITA
No.2227/M/2023). Admittedly no rectification application is
available on online portal and therefore nothing requires to be
adjudicated.
3. Even otherwise in the authorization memo available on
record, main grievance of the Revenue Department as it appears,
is that the Tribunal while deciding the impugned order has not
considered the judgment of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in
the case of PCIT vs. Totgars Cooperative Sale Society Ltd. (2017)
395 ITR 611 (Kar.).
4. I observe that the co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the
appeal of the Assessee mainly relied on the judgment passed by
the Hon’ble co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of
Padhara Prabha Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. ITO (ITA
No.1346 & 1347/M/2023 decided on 27.07.2023) (2023) 153
MA No.155/M/2024
(Arising out of ITA No.2227/M/2023)
M/s. Blue Rose Industrial Premises Co-op Society Limited
3
taxmann.com 714 (Mumbai-Tri.) wherein identical issue whether
the interest/dividend income earned from cooperative bank can
be claimed as deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act or not. I
observe that the Hon’ble Bench specifically dealt with the
decision rendered by the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the
case of PCIT vs. Totgars Cooperative Sale Society Ltd. (2017)
395 ITR 611 (Kar.), on which the Revenue Department is
claiming that the same has not been considered by the Tribunal.
Hence, on the aforesaid facts, even otherwise, if I consider the
authorization memo dated 20.06.2024 itself as a miscellaneous
application, then also the claim of the Revenue is un-sustainable,
as there is no apparent error, which requires any rectification in
the impugned order.
5. Considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances,
the miscellaneous application registered as MA No.155/M/2024 is
not maintainable being without any application and even
otherwise for the want of limitation. Hence the same is
dismissed.
6. In the result, the instant MA stands dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 19.08.2024.
Sd/-
(NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY)
JUDICIAL MEMBER
* Kishore, Sr. P.S.
MA No.155/M/2024
(Arising out of ITA No.2227/M/2023)
M/s. Blue Rose Industrial Premises Co-op Society Limited
4
Copy to: The Appellant
The Respondent
The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai
The DR Concerned Bench
//True Copy//
By Order
Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.