, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, CHENNAI . . . , BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER M.A. NOS. 207 & 208/MDS/2016 [ IN I.T.A. NOS. 563 & 564/MDS/2016 ] ASSESSMENT YEARS: 2007-08 & 2009-10 M/S. USAMAH AGENCIES, OLD NO.8, NEW NO.14, PATNOOL SARDAR JUNG STREET, PERIAMET, CHENNAI 600 003. PAN: AAAFU1880A V. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON-CORPORATE WARD 6(3), CHENNAI 600 034. ( APPLICANT) ( / RESPONDENT) APPLICANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI A.V. SHREEKANTH, JCIT / DATE OF HEARING : 23.12.2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 23.12.2016 / // / O R D E R PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THE ASSESSEE FILED THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION PRA YING FOR RECALL OF THIS TRIBUNAL ORDER DATED 15.06.2016. 2. THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION WAS FIXED FOR HEARIN G ON 14.10.2016. IT WAS ADJOURNED TO 11.11.2016. ON 1 1.11.2016, NO ONE APPEARED FOR THE ASSESSEE. THEREFORE THE MISC ELLANEOUS PETITION WAS ADJOURNED TO 23.12.2016 AND THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS 2 M.A. NO. 207&208/MDS/2016 ISSUED TO THE ASSESSEE BY R.P.A.D. THE POSTAL AUT HORITIES RETURNED THE NOTICE OF HEARING AS NOT CLAIMED. THERE MAY BE VARIOUS REASONS FOR THE ASSESSEE FOR NOT CLAIMING THE REGIS TER LETTER AFTER INTIMATION FROM THE CONCERNED POSTAL AUTHORITY. T HEREFORE IT HAS TO BE PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION ANY FURTHER. THEREFORE THE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSE CUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 23 RD DECEMBER, 2016 AT CHENNAI. SD/- ( . . . ) (N.R.S. GANESAN) /JUDICIAL MEMBER /CHENNAI, /DATED, THE 23 RD DECEMBER, 2016. JR. /COPY TO: 1. /APPELLANT 2. /RESPONDENT 3. ( ) /CIT(A) 4. /CIT, 5. ! /DR 6. '#$ /GF.