HIRJI AVCHAR NOR, Mumbai V. ITO 30(1)(4), Mumbai

MA 214/MUM/2020

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0584 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s) 13 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 12-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: H
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 31-08-2020
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: GURBINDER SINGH
• Section: 13

Judgement Text

M.A. NO.214/MUM/2020 A.Y. 2012 - 13 (ARISING OUT OF ITA NO. 456/MUM/2019) HIRJI AVCHAR NOR VS. ITO,30(1)(4) 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL H BENCH, M UMBAI BEFORE SHRI M. BALAGANESH , AM AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM M.A. NO. 214/MUM/2020 (ARISING OUT OF ITA NO. 456 /MUM/201 9) ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2012 - 13 ) HIRJI AVCHAR NOR GALA A.K. VAIDYA MARG, DINDOSHI, MALAD (EAST) MUMBAI 400097 / VS. ITO, 30(1)(4), C - 13, 5 TH FLOOR, R. NO. 510, PRATYKSHKAR BHAVAN, BKC, BANDRA EAST, MUMBAI - 400051 ./ ./ PAN NO. AGJPP4735A ( / APPLICANT) : ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPLICANT BY : (WITHDRAWAL LETTER DATED 12.01.2021) / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI GURBINDER SINGH, D.R / DATE OF HEARING : 12.02 .2021 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 12 .0 2 .2021 / O R D E R PER RAVISH SOOD, JM: THE PRESENT MISCEL LANEOUS APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARISES FROM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL WHILE DISPOSING OFF HIS APPEAL VIZ. HIRJI AVCHAR NOR VS. ITO - 30(1)(4), MUMBAI, ITA NO. 567/MUM/2019 FOR A.Y. 2012 - 13, DATED 04.03.2020 . 2. THE ASSESSEE S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (FOR SHORT A.R), VID E HIS LETTER DATED 12.01.2021 HAS SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAD FILED AN APPLICATION UNDE R THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME AND FORM NO. 3 HAD THEREIN M.A. NO.214/MUM/2020 A.Y. 2012 - 13 (ARISING OUT OF ITA NO. 456/MUM/2019) HIRJI AVCHAR NOR VS. ITO,30(1)(4) 2 BEEN ISSUED. IT IS, THUS, SUBMITTED BY THE LD. A.R, THAT AS THE DISPUTE THEREIN INVOLVED STANDS RESOLVED, THE REFORE, THE AFORESAID MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION MAY BE PERMITTED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 3. PER CONTRA, THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (FOR SHORT D.R) DID NOT OBJECT TO THE AFORESAID REQUEST OF THE ASSES SEE. 4. IN THE BACKDROP OF THE AFORESAID FACTS, WE HEREIN ALLOW THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THE CAPTIONED MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION. 5. ACCORDINGLY, THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASS ESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 12 .02.2021 SD/ - SD/ - ( M. BALAGANESH ) (RAVISH SOOD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI ; 12. 02.2021 PS: ROHIT / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ( ) / THE CIT(A) - 4. / CIT 5. , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. / GUARD FILE . //TRUE COPY// / BY ORDER, / (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI