, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, MUMBAI . . , , , BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA , JUDICIAL MEMB ER . / M.A . NO. 220 / MUM./20 1 3 ( . / M.A . NO. 603/ MUM./20 12 ( . / ITA NO. 2906 / MUM./ 20 1 1 ) ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 20 0 5 06 ) MR. KIKIMAL K. CHHABRIA PROP: M/S. CREATIONS 268, A Z, INDUSTRIAL E STATE GANPATRAO KADAM MARG LOWER PAREL, MUMBAI 400 013 .. / APPELLANT V/S INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 18(2)(3), AAYAKAR BHAWAN 101, M.K. ROAD, MUMBAI 400 020 .... / RESPONDENT . / PE RMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER AAAPC6123E / ASSESSEE BY : MR. K.R. LAXMINARAYANAN / REVENUE BY : MR. RAVI KUMAR A/W MR. SENTHIL KUMARAN S. / DATE OF HEARING 06 .0 6 .2014 / DATE OF ORDER 06.06.2014 / ORDER , / PER AMIT SHUKLA , J.M. THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION (M.A.) HAS BEEN FILED IN RELATION TO THE ORDER DATED 26 TH MARCH 213, PASSED IN M.A. NO.603/MUM./2012, WHI CH WAS IN RELATION TO ITA NO.2906/MUM./2011. THUS, THIS M.A. IS MR. KIKIMAL K. CHHABRIA 2 AGAINST THE ORDER 26 TH MARCH 2013, PASSED IN THE M.A. NO.603/MUM./ 2012. 2 . THE CONTENTS RAISED IN THE M.A. ARE EXACTLY SIMILAR TO THE CONTENTS RAISED IN THE EARLIER APPLICATION , WHICH WAS DISPO SED OFF AFTER GIVING DETAIL REASONING. THUS, WE DO NOT FIND ANY SUBSTANCE IN THE PRESENT M.A. AND THE SAME IS ACCORDINGLY DISMISSED. 8 . 9 . IN THE RESULT, ASSESSEE S MISC. APPLICATION IS DISMISSED. 6 TH JUNE 2014 ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 6 TH JUNE 2014 SD/ - . . P.M. JAGTAP ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SD/ - AMIT SHUKLA JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED : 6 TH JUNE 2014 / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : ( 1 ) / THE ASSESSEE ; ( 2 ) / THE REVENUE; ( 3 ) ( ) / THE CIT(A ) ; ( 4 ) / THE CIT, MUMBAI CITY CONCERNED ; ( 5 ) , , / THE DR, ITAT, MUMBAI ; ( 6 ) / GUARD FILE . / TRUE COPY / BY ORDER . / PRADEEP J. CHOWDHURY / SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY / / (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI