Smt. Harniranjan Kaur, Jalandhar V. The Income-tax Officer, Jalandhar

MA 25/ASR/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2012] 123 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7680 (ITAT-AMRITSAR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 11 month(s) 22 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 24-02-2012
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2000-2001
• Appeal Filed On: 04-03-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR. BEFORE SH. H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. B.P. JAIN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M.A. NO.25(ASR)/2010 (ARISING OUT OF I.T.A. NO.336 (ASR)/2009 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2000-01 PAN : SMT. HARNIRANJAN KAUR, VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER , JALANDHAR. WARD III(1), JALANDHAR. (APPLICANT) (RESPONDENT) APPLICANT BY:WRITTEN SUBMISSION RESPONDENT :SH. LAXMAN SINGH,(CIT) DR DATE OF HEARING:24.02.2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT:24.02.2012 ORDER PER BENCH: THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE PRESENT MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR RECALLING THE ORDER DATED 18T.01.2010, PASSED BY TH E BENCH WITH A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DIRECTION REGARDING SETTING ASIDE THE I SSUE, IN DISPUTE, TO THE FILE OF LD. CIT(A) FOR ADJUDICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH T HE PROVISIONS OF LAW INSTEAD OF SETTING THE ISSUE TO THE FILE OF A.O. BUT IN THE COURSE OF APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS TODAY, WE HAVE RECEIVED WRITTEN SUBMISS ION FROM THE ASSESSSEE, 2 DATED 21.02.2012, REQUESTING TO WITHDRAW THE MISCEL LANEOUS APPLICATION, THE CONTENTS OF WHICH ARE REPRODUCED AS UNDER: HONBLE MEMBERS. INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR. RE: SMT. HARNIRANJAN KAUR, 714, URBAN ESTATE, PHASE -1, JALANDHAR, MA NO.25(ASR)/10 ARISING OUT OF ITA NO.336(ASR)/2009 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2000-01. WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS HEARING FIXED FOR 24.02.2012. RESPECTED SIR, THE HEARING OF THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FILED BY ME HAS BEEN FIXED FOR 24.2.2012. IN THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION I HAD PRAYED THAT WHILE DISPOSING OFF THE EARLIER APPEAL NO.336(ASR)/2009 THE MATTER SHOULD HAVE BEEN SET ASIDE TO THE FILE A PPEAL OF THE CIT(A) AND NOT TO THE FILE OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER. THE P RESENT POSITION IS THAT AFTER THE MATTER WAS SET ASIDE TO THE FILE OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER, THE SAME WAS DISPOSED OFF THROUGH THE ASSESSMENT OR DER DATED 21.12.2010 AND AN APPEAL AGAINST THIS ORDER IS NOW PENDING BEFORE THE CIT(A). COPY OF THE DOCUMENT EVIDENCING THE FILING OF THE APPEAL BEFORE THE CIT(A) ARE ENCLOSED AT PAGE NO. 1 & 2. SINCE THE MATTER IS NOW BEFORE THE CIT(A) WHICH IS WHAT HAD BEEN PRAYED IN THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION, I T IS REQUESTED THAT THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FILED BY ME MAY PLEAS E BE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN. THANKING YOU, YOURS FAITHFULLY, SD/- HARNIRANJAN KAUR, 714, URBAN ESTATE, PHASE-1, JALANDHAR. 2. IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID REQUEST MADE BY THE ASS ESSEE, THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 3 5. IN THE RESULT, THE MISC. APPLICATION FILED BY TH E ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 24TH FEBRUARY, 2012. SD/- SD/- (B.P.JAIN) (H. S. SIDHU) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 24TH FEBRUARY, 2012 /SKR/ COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1. THE ASSESSEE: SMT. HARNIRANJAN KAUR, JALANDHAR. 2. THE ITO WARD-III(1), JALANDHAR. 3. THE CIT(A), JALANHAR. 4. THE CIT, JLR 5. THE CIT, THE SR DR, ITAT, AMRITSAR. TRUE COPY BY ORDER (ASSISTANT REGISTRAR) INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH : AMRITSAR.