HARRIL THOMAS MONTEIRO, V. ITO 22(3)-1,

MA 28/MUM/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 123 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6420 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 24 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 06-05-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: H
• Assessment Year: 2003-2004
• Appeal Filed On: 13-01-2011
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: VANDANA SAGAR
• Assessee Lawyers: RITIKA GARG

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH H MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI T.R. SOOD (AM) AND SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGH AVAN (JM) M.A. NO. 28/MUM/2011 (ARISING OUT OF ITA NO. 1270/MUM/2010) ASSESSMENT YEAR-2003-04 SHRI HARRIL THOMAS MONTEIRO, A-4, RAM TANU, SECTOR-17, PLOT NO. 20, NERUL, NAVI MUMBAI-400 706 PAN-ACRPM 4697E VS. THE ITO 22(3) - 1, MUMBAI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: SMT. RITIKA GARG RESPONDENT BY: SMT. VANDANA SAGAR O R D E R PER ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN (JM) BY THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION, THE ASSESSEE RE QUESTED TO RECALL THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL PASSED ON 10 TH NOVEMBER, 2010 ON THE GROUND THAT THE ASSESSEE DID NOT RECEIVE THE NOTICE AND TH EREBY COULD NOT APPEAR BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. 2 WE FIND THAT THE REASONING GIVEN BY THE ASSESSEE IS SATISFACTORY, AND, ACCORDINGLY WE ACCEPT THE SAME. 3. ACCORDINGLY, WE RECALL THE ORDER DT. 10.11.2010 AND DIRECT THE REGISTRY TO FIX THE APPEAL FOR FRESH HEARING ON 24. 5.2011. SINCE THE DATE WAS ANNOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT, NO FORMAL NOTICE W ILL BE ISSUED TO THE PARTIES FOR THE HEARING OF THIS APPEAL ON 24.5.2011 . M.A. NO. 28 /M/11 2 4. IN THE RESULT, THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FIL ED BY THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 6 TH DAY OF MAY, 2011. SD/- SD/- (T.R. SOOD) (ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED 6 TH MAY, 2011 RJ COPY TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT-CONCERNED 4. THE CIT(A)-CONCERNED 5. THE DR H BENCH TRUE COPY BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR, I.T.A.T, MUMBAI M.A. NO. 28 /M/11 3 DATE INITIALS 1 DRAFT DICTATED ON: 2.5.2011 SR. PS/PS 2. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHOR: 2.5.2011 ______ SR. PS/PS 3. DRAFT PROPOSED & PLACED BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER: _________ _ _____ JM/AM 4. DRAFT DISCUSSED/APPROVED BY SECOND MEMBER: _________ ______ JM/AM 5. APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR. PS/PS: _________ ______ SR. PS/PS 6. KEPT FOR PRONOUNCEMENT ON: _________ ______ SR. PS/PS 7. FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK: _________ __ ____ SR. PS/PS 8. 9. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK: DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO AR _________ ______ 10 . DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER: _________ ______