The Dy. Commr. of Income Tax, Morbi Circle, Morbi V. M/s Alfa Vitrified Pvt. Ltd., Morbi

MA 33/RJT/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 104 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4542 (ITAT-RAJKOT)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 17 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 28-04-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 10-04-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Tax effect; Tax effect

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरणआयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, राजकोट 瀈यायपीठ 瀈यायपीठ瀈यायपीठ 瀈यायपीठ, , , , राजकोट IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT (Conducted Through Virtual Court) ] ] BEFORE SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER M.A. NO.33 /RJT/2019 WITH ITA No.273/RJT/2017 Assessment Year :2013-14 DCIT, Morbi Circle Morbi. Vs M/s.Alfa Vitrified P.Ltd. PAN : AAJCA 1071 F Survey No.943/p, Nr. Lexus Granito Lakhhirpur Road Morbi. (Applicant) (Responent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri S.S. Rathi, Sr.DR स ु नवाई क तार ख/D a t e o f H e a r i n g : 2 9 / 0 4 / 2 0 2 2 घोषणा क तार ख /D a t e o f P r o n o u n c e m e n t : 2 9 / 0 4 / 2 0 2 2 आदेश/O R D E R PER T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present Misc. Application is filed at the instance of the Revenue pointing out apparent error qua the present assessee in ITA No.273/RJT/2017 which included in a consolidated order of Tribunal dated 30.7.2018 in a bunch of cases disposed of vide ITA No.396/RJT/2015 and 181 others. 2. In the MA, it is pleaded by the Revenue in the application that in the impugned common order, the appeal of the Revenue being ITA MA No.33/RJT/2019 with ITA 2 No. 273/RJT/2017was dismissed on the ground that tax effect by virtue of relief given by the ld.CIT(A) was less than the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT Instruction no.03/2018 dated 11.7.2018 i.e. Rs.20 lakhs, hence, the appeal of the Revenue is not maintainable. However, the tax effect involved on the issues appealed was more than Rs.20 lakhs i.e. Rs.45,99,450/-, and hence, this mistake requires to be rectified and the appeal of the Revenue may be recalled and decided on merit. 3. After going through the pleadings of the Revenue in the MA, we find that the ITAT in special drive to dispose of those cases where tax effect in the appeals filed by the Revenue is below Rs.20 lakhs as per CBDT circular no.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018, the Tribunal had disposed of as many as 181 appeals vide order dated 30.7.2018 impugned by the Revenue. In this bunch of appeals also included the present appeal, where tax effect is more than the limit prescribed under CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018. This is due to oversight mistake and requires rectification. Therefore, we recall the impugned order dated 30.7.2018 qua ITA No.273/RJT/2017 and proceed to dispose of the same. ITA No.273/RJT/2017 Asstt.Year 2010-11 4. None appeared on behalf of the assessee. At the outset, after going through the grounds of appeal, it is noticed that the tax effect involved in this appeal would be less than Rs.50 lakhs, and therefore, a query was made to the ld.DR by the Bench, though the appeal was not hit by the CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018, but hit by recent CBDT Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 8.8.2019 by which the CBDT has revised monetary limit to Rs.50 lakhs and prohibited the Revenue from filing appeal in the Tribunal MA No.33/RJT/2019 with ITA 3 where tax effect is below Rs.50 lakhs or not. To the query, the ld.DR did not contest and fairly conceded that the tax effect of the present appeal is below Rs.50 lakhs, and left the matter to the Tribunal to pass appropriate order in accordance with law. 5. On due consideration of the facts and circumstances, we find that the CBDT is issuing instruction from time to time by revising threshold monetary limit for filing appeal before the Tribunal by the Department. Now monetary limit for filing appeal by the Department before the Tribunal, has been raised to Rs.50 lakhs, as against Rs.20 lakhs when the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed. This instruction No.17 of 2019 of the CBDT is applicable to the pending cases also. Admittedly in the present appeal, tax effect is below Rs.50 lakhs. Thus, even though the appeal of the Revenue is restored to its original number, it is dismissed by applying the new CBDT Instruction No.17 of 2019 which revised the monetary limit to Rs.50 lakhs for filing appeal before the Tribunal. Therefore, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed. 6. In the result, Revenue’s Misc. Application is allowed; however, appeal is dismissed due to revised low tax effect. Order pronounced in the Court on 29 th April, 2022 at Ahmedabad. Sd/- Sd/- (ANNAPURNA GUPTA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad, dated 29/04/2022 vk*