The ITO, Tanuku V. Potru Murali Krishna, Kovvur

MA 43/VIZ/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 124 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6350 (ITAT-VISAKHAPATNAM)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 1 month(s) 21 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 19-02-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 29-12-2016
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: Y SESHA SRINIVAS
• Keywords: Tax effect

Judgement Text

MP NOS.43/VIZAG/2016 SRI POTRU MURALI KRISHNA, KOVVUR, W.G. DIST. 1 , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM . , . .. . . . . . ' , % BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M.P. NO.43/VIZAG/2016 (ARISING OUT OF I.T.A.NOS.534/VIZAG/2014) ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-11) ITO, WARD - 2 TANUKU SRI POTRU MURALI KRISHNA, KOVVUR, W.G. DIST. [PAN NO. AEMPP5584N ] ( ' / APPELLANT) ( ()' / RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI Y. SESHA SRINIVAS, DR / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI C. SUBRAHMANYA M, AR / DATE OF HEARING : 09.02.2018 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 1 9.02.2018 / O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER: THIS MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THIS TRIBUNAL ORDER IN ITA NO.534/VIZAG/2014 DATED 5.5.2016, WHICH WAS DISMISSED BEING NOT MAINTAINABLE INVOLVING TAX EFFE CT. 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LD. D.R. ARGUE D THAT ON GOING THROUGH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL, IT IS NOT ICED THAT THERE IS A MP NOS.43/VIZAG/2016 SRI POTRU MURALI KRISHNA, KOVVUR, W.G. DIST. 2 MISTAKE APPARENT FROM THE FACE OF THE ORDER WITH RE GARD TO TAX EFFECT INVOLVED. 3. THE LD. A.R. OBJECTED THE ARGUMENT OF THE LD. D. R. STATING THAT THERE IS NO ERROR APPARENT ON RECORD PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL INVOLVING TAX EFFECT. 4. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND PERUSED THE OR DER PASSED BY THIS TRIBUNAL AND IT IS OBSERVED THAT THERE IS NO M ISTAKE APPARENT FROM THE FACE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS TRIBUNAL ON 5. 5.2016 AND HENCE, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE I S DISMISSED. THE ABOVE ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 19 TH FEB18. SD/- SD/- ( . .. . . . . . ' ) ( . ) (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) (V. DURGA RAO) /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /JUDICIAL MEMBER ! /VISAKHAPATNAM: % /DATED : 19.02.2018 VG/SPS )! *! /COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. / THE APPELLANT THE ITO, WARD-2, TANUKU 2. / THE RESPONDENT SRI POTRU MURALI KRISHNA, 4-2-20 , NANDAMURI ROAD, KOVVUR, W.G. DIST. 5. + / THE CIT, VISAKHAPATNAM 6. + ( ) / THE CIT (A), VISAKHAPATNAM 7. ! . , . , ! / DR, ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM 8 . / GUARD FILE / BY ORDER // TRUE COPY //