The ACIT, 2(1), Indore V. Smt. Shardadevi Mittal, Indore

MA 63/IND/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 123 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7394 (ITAT-INDORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 13 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 16-12-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2005-2006
• Appeal Filed On: 03-11-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ARUN DEWAN
• Assessee Lawyers: SHRI
• Section: 2

Judgement Text

1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI JOGINDER SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI R.C. SHARMA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MA NO.63/IND/2011 (ARISING OUT OF ITA NO.88/IND/2011) A.Y. 2005-06 ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2(1) INDORE ... APPLICANT VS SMT. SHARDA DEVI MITTRAL INDORE ... RESPONDENT APPLICANT BY : SHRI ARUN DEWAN, SR. DR RESPONDENT BY : SHRI PANKAJ MOGRA DATE OF HEARING : 16.12.2011 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 16.12.2011 O R D E R PER JOGINDER SINGH BY WAY OF THE PRESENT MISCELLANEOUS PETITION U/S 2 54(2) OF THE ACT THE REVENUE SEEKS RECTIFICATION IN THE ORDE R DATED 2 30.6.2011 ON THE GROUND THAT THE ASSESSMENT YEAR ME NTIONED IN THE TITLE OF THE SAID ORDER IS 2005-06 WHERE IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN 2007-08. 2. WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PER USED THE MATERIAL AVAILABLE ON FILE. WE FIND THAT THAT THERE IS AN INADVERTENT CLERICAL/TYPING MISTAKE IN THE TITLE OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL. WE, THEREFORE, RECTIFY THE SAME ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT THE ASSESSMENT YEAR IN ITA NO. 88/IND/2011 MAY BE R EAD AS ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08 IN PLACE OF 2005-06 MENTION ED IN THE ORDER DATED 30.6.2011. ACCORDINGLY, THIS MISCELLANEOUS PETITION IS ALLOWE D. ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 16.12.20 11 IN THE PRESENCE OF LEARNED REPRESENTATIVES OF BOTH THE SIDES. SD SD (R.C.SHARMA) (JOGINDER SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 16.12.2011 COPY TO: APPELLANT, RESPONDENT, CIT, CIT(A), DR, GU ARD FILE DN/-