KISHORE H. MEHTA (HUF), V. ITO 25(30(2),

MA 652/MUM/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2013] 124 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0327 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 6 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Miscellaneous Application
• Pronouncement Date: 17-05-2013
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 22-10-2012
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: O P MEENA

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH, A MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AN D SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER MA NO: 652/MUM/2012 ARISING OUT OF : 1770/MUM/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07 SHRI KISHORE H. MEHTA(HUF) D-201, PANCHSHEEL GARDENS, DAHANUKAR WADI, MAHAVIR NAGAR, KANDIVALI(W) MUMBAI- 400 067. PAN: AACHK 7504 H INCOME TAX OFFICER-25(3)(2) C-11, R.NO.306, PRATYAKSHAKAR BHAVAN BANDRA-KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA(E) MUMBAI-51. (APPLICANT) VS. (RESPONDENT) APPLICANT BY : SHRI NISHIT GANDHI RESPONDENT BY : SHRI O.P. MEENA DATE OF HEARING : 17.5.2013 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 17.5.2013 ORDER PER RAJENDRA SINGH (AM). THIS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED BY TH E ASSESSEE REQUESTING FOR CORRECTING CERTAIN MISTAKES APPEARIN G IN THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED 7.9.2011 IN ITA NO.1770/MUM/2010. 2. THE LD. AR FOR THE ASSESSEE POINTED OUT THAT THE ASSESSMENT YEAR APPEARING IN THE 3 RD LINE OF PAGE-1 OF THE ORDER HAS BEEN INCORRECTLY MENTIONED AS 2004-05. SIMILARLY ON FIRST PAGE OF T HE ORDER IT HAS BEEN INCORRECTLY MENTIONED THAT SHRI VIPUL JOSHI HAD APP EARED FOR THE APPELLANT WHEN HE HAD APPEARED FOR THE RESPONDENT-ASSESSEE. I T WAS REQUESTED THAT THE ORDER MAY BE CORRECTED. MA NO.652/M/12 ARISING OU T OF ITA NO.1770/M/10 A.Y: 06-07 2 3. WE HAVE PERUSED THE RECORDS AND CONSIDERED THE M ATTER CAREFULLY. CERTAIN TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS HAVE CREPT IN THE ORDE R DATED 7.9.2011 OF THE TRIBUNAL WHICH ARE BEING CORRECTED IN THIS ORDER. I) THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05 APPEARING IN THE THIRD LINE ON FIRST PAGE OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL IS SUBSTITUTED BY ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07. II) SIMILARLY ON PAGE-1 OF THE ORDER THE WORDS VIPUL J OSHI FOR THE APPELLANT IS SUBSTITUTED BY CGK NAIR FOR APPELLAN T AND THE WORDS CGK NAIR FOR RESPONDENT IS SUBSTITUTED BY VIPUL JOSHI FOR THE RESPONDENT. THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION IS THUS A LLOWED. 4. IN THE RESULT THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION STAN DS ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 17.5.2013. SD/- SD/- ( AMIT SHUKLA) ( RAJENDRA SINGH ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCO UNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED: 17.5. 2013. JV. COPY TO: THE APPLICANT THE RESPONDENT THE CIT, CONCERNED, MUMBAI THE CIT(A) CONCERNED, MUMBAI THE DR BENCH TRUE COPY BY ORDER DY/ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI.