, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL G BENCH, MUMBAI , . , BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI RAJENDRA, AM ! / MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NOS. 673 TO 679/MUM/2012 ARISING OUT OF ./ I.T.A. NOS. 5018/M/2011(ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002-03) I.T.A. NOS. 5019/M/2011(ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05) I.T.A. NOS. 5020/M/2011(ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06) I.T.A. NOS. 5021/M/2011(ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07) I.T.A. NOS. 7759/M/2011(ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09) I.T.A. NOS. 3601/M/2012(ASSESSMENT YEAR 2003-04) I.T.A. NOS. 3611/M/2012(ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08) MS GEETHA MEH MS GEETHA MEH MS GEETHA MEH MS GEETHA MEHR RR RA AA A C/O SAKSHI GALLERY C/O SAKSHI GALLERY C/O SAKSHI GALLERY C/O SAKSHI GALLERY GROUND FLOOR, GROUND FLOOR, GROUND FLOOR, GROUND FLOOR, TANNA HOUSE TANNA HOUSE TANNA HOUSE TANNA HOUSE 11A NATHALAL PARIIKH MARG 11A NATHALAL PARIIKH MARG 11A NATHALAL PARIIKH MARG 11A NATHALAL PARIIKH MARG COLABA COLABA COLABA COLABA MUMB MUMB MUMB MUMBAI 400 001 AI 400 001 AI 400 001 AI 400 001 ! ! ! ! / VS. VS. VS. VS. THE DY COMMR OF INCOME TAX THE DY COMMR OF INCOME TAX THE DY COMMR OF INCOME TAX THE DY COMMR OF INCOME TAX CENT CIR CENT CIR CENT CIR CENT CIR 44 M 44 M 44 M 44 MUMBAI UMBAI UMBAI UMBAI $ $ $ $ ./ % % % % ./ PAN/GIR NO. : PAN/GIR NO. : PAN/GIR NO. : PAN/GIR NO. : AAGPM9039H AAGPM9039H AAGPM9039H AAGPM9039H ( (( ( $& $& $& $& / APP APP APP APPLICANT LICANT LICANT LICANT) )) ) .. .. .. .. ( (( ( '($& '($& '($& '($& / RESPONDENT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT) )) ) $& $& $& $& ) ) ) ) / APPLICANT BY : SHRI PRABHAKAR '($& '($& '($& '($& * ** * ) ) ) ) /RESPONDENT BY : SMT PARMINDER ! ! ! ! * ** * + + + + / DT. OF HEARING : 12 TH APRIL 2013 ,-. ,-. ,-. ,-. * ** *+ + + + /DT.OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 12 TH APRIL 2013 / / O R D E R PER : , . . / VIJAY PAL RAO, JM THESE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS BY THE ASSESSEE AR E DIRECTED AGAINST COMPOSITE ORDER DATED 31 ST JULY 2012 OF THIS TRIBUNAL WHEREBY THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE FOR THE AYS 2002-03 TO 2008 -09 WERE DISPOSED OFF. MA NOS 673 TO 679/M/2012 . 2 2 DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LD COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE PREFERRED THE APPEALS B EFORE THE HONBLE HIGH COURT AND THE HONBLE HIGH COURT HAS ADMITTE D THE SAME VIDE ORDER DATED 20 TH FEB 2013. HE HAS FILED A COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT WHEREBY THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE ADMIT TED. 3 IN VIEW OF THE FACTS THAT THE SUBJECT MATTER IS S UB-JUDICE BEFORE THE HONBLE HIGH COURT, THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED. 4 IN THE RESULT, THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS OF THE ASSESSES ARE DISMISSED. 0 +1 2! 30+ * / ! 0 * + 45 ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS DAY OF 1 2 TH APRIL 2013 / * -. 6 7!1 12 TH ' - * 8 SD/- SD/- ( (( ( , ) )) ) ( (( ( RAJENDRA RAJENDRA RAJENDRA RAJENDRA ) ) ) ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( (( ( ) )) ) 2 (VIJAY PAL RAO ) (VIJAY PAL RAO ) (VIJAY PAL RAO ) (VIJAY PAL RAO ) JUDICIAL MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER PLACE: MUMBAI : DATED: 12 TH APRIL 2013 RAJ* MA NOS 673 TO 679/M/2012 . 3 COPY FORWARDED TO: 1 APPELLANT 2 RESPONDENT 3 CIT 4 CIT(A) 5 DR /TRUE COPY/ BY ORDER DY /AR, ITAT, MUMBAI