"अपीलीयअिधकरण, इȽौरɊायपीठ, इȽौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 642/Ind/2024 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Madhya Bharat International Pvt. Ltd., 630, Usha Nagar Extension Indore बनाम/ Vs. NFAC New Delhi, New Delhi (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue / Respondent) P.A. No. AADCM8494Q Assessee by Ms. Shreya Jain, AR Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 24.07.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 28.07.2025 आदेश/ O R D E R Per B.M. Biyani, AM: Feeling aggrieved by order of first-appeal dated 16.07.2024 passed by learned CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi [“CIT(A)”], which in turn arises out of penalty-order dated 22.01.2022 passed by the learned National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi [“AO”] u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for assessment-year [“AY”] 2016-17, the assessee has filed this appeal on the grounds as mentioned in Appeal-Memo (Form No. 36). Printed from counselvise.com Madhya Bharat International Pvt. Ltd. ITA No.642/Ind/2024 Assessment Year 2016-17 2 2. Heard the learned Representatives of both sides and case-record perused. 3. Ld. AR for assessee briefly summarized the facts of case like this : For AY 2016-17 under consideration, the assessment of assessee was completed by Ld. AO u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 vide assessment-order dated 24.09.2021 after making an addition of Rs. 1,33,00,000/- u/s 56(2)(viib) in respect of share application money. Thereafter, vide penalty-order dated 22.01.2022, the Ld. AO also imposed penalty of Rs. 43,97,379/- u/s 271(1)(c) qua the addition of Rs. 1,33,00,000/- made in assessment-order. Against aforesaid assessment-order, the assessee filed appeal before CIT(A) and the CIT(A) has already decided assessee’s appeal vide order dated 25.10.2024, a copy of the order is placed on record. Drawing our attention to Para No. 5.5 & 6 of this order of CIT(A), Ld. AR demonstrated that the CIT(A) has set aside the aforesaid assessment-order dated 24.09.2021 and remanded case back to AO for a fresh assessment on de novo basis. Ld. AR’s limited prayer in this situation is such that when the assessment-order stands set aside to the file of AO for a fresh adjudication, the penalty-order imposing penalty u/s 271(1)(c) qua the addition made in assessment-order, should also be restored at the level of AO for a fresh adjudication based on outcome of fresh assessment-order. 4. Ld. DR fairly agreed to the submission and prayer of Ld. AR. 5. In view of the above facts and submissions of parties, we remand this penalty-matter to the file of AO for a fresh adjudication on the basis of outcome Printed from counselvise.com Madhya Bharat International Pvt. Ltd. ITA No.642/Ind/2024 Assessment Year 2016-17 3 of fresh assessment-order. Needless to mention that before finalizing penalty- matter, the AO shall give a fresh opportunity to assessee and consider assessee’s submissions. 6. In the result the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in open court on 15/07/2025 Sd/- (PARESH M. JOSHI) Sd/- (B.M. BIYANI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Indore; िदनांकDated : 15/07/2025 Patel/Sr. PS Copy to: Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ITAT (DR)/Guard file. By order Sr. Private Secretary, Indore Printed from counselvise.com "