MANISH CHANDRAKANT THAKKAR,PUNE V. DCIT CIRCLE 7, PUNE

ITA 919/PUN/2025

AI Insights

The case involves an appeal by Manish Chandrakant Thakkar against an ex-parte order of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC, which confirmed the addition made by the Assessing Officer determining the total income of the assessee significantly higher than the returned income. The assessee, engaged in trading and deriving income from various sources, had his case reopened following a search and seizure action that revealed substantial investments. The Assessing Officer's addition to the income was contested but initially upheld due to the non-response of the assessee's tax consultant to notices from the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC. The Tribunal, considering the circumstances and the potential for the assessee to substantiate his case, decided to remand the matter back to the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC for a detailed examination.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 712470 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 29-07-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Other Referred Cases: CIT vs. B.N. Bhattacharjee (1979) 118 ITR 461 (SC)
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RAMNATH P MURKUNDE
• Assessee Lawyers: SUHAS P. BORA
• Keywords: Search and seizure; Co-operative Credit Society
• Section: 147; 148; 132

Judgement Text

"IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT AND MS. ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.919/PUN/2025 Assessment year : 2015-16 Manish Chandrakant Thakkar Flat No.806, C-Building, Eisha Pearl, Near Kumar Prithvi, Market Yard, Kondhwa Khurd, Pune – 411048 Vs. DCIT, Circle 7, Pune PAN: ADKPT4681P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Suhas P. Bora Department by : Shri Ramnath P Murkunde Date of hearing : 28-07-2025 Date of pronouncement : 29-07-2025 O R D E R PER R.K. PANDA, VP: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex-parte order dated 19.03.2025 of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC, relating to assessment year 2015-16. 2. Although a number of grounds have been raised by the assessee, however, these all relate to the ex-parte order of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC in confirming the order of the Assessing Officer determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.1,13,07,379/- as against the returned income of Rs.3,74,020/-. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual engaged in business of trading in gunny bags and derives income from house property, income from profit and gains of business or profession, income from capital gain and Printed from counselvise.com 2 ITA No.919/PUN/2025 income from other sources. He filed his return of income for the impugned assessment year on 26.08.2015 declaring total income of Rs.3,74,020/- which was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Information was obtained during the course of search and seizure action u/s 132 of the Act in case of Renuka Mata Multi State Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. that the assessee has made investments to the tune of Rs.1,09,33,250/-. Therefore, the case of the assessee was reopened under the provisions of section 147 of the Act. Accordingly notice u/s 148 of the Act was issued to the assessee. Rejecting the various explanations given by the assessee, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.1,13,07,379/- u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE of the Act. 4. Since the assessee did not respond to the various notices issued by the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC, the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC dismissed the appeal filed by the assesse by relying on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B.N. Bhattacharjee (1979) 118 ITR 461 (SC) and various other decisions. 5. Aggrieved with such order of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that all the notices issued by the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC were addressed to the e-mail id of the consultant with a copy to the assessee. He submitted that the assessee used to forward all the notices to his tax consultant. However, for the reasons best known to him, the tax consultant Printed from counselvise.com 3 ITA No.919/PUN/2025 did not respond to any of the notices issued by the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC for which he has passed an ex-parte order. Referring to the contents of the affidavit to this effect, he submitted that all these unfortunate events happened due to the inaction of the tax consultant. He submitted that in the interest of justice, the assessee should be given an opportunity to substantiate his case by filing the requisite details. 7. The Ld. DR on the other hand submitted that adequate opportunity was granted to the assessee by the Assessing Officer as well as the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC. Therefore, the order of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC confirming the addition made by the Assessing Officer should be upheld and the grounds raised by the assessee be dismissed. 8. We have heard the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the Assessing Officer and Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC and the paper book filed on behalf of the assessee. We have also considered the various decisions cited before us. It is an admitted fact that due to non-appearance / non-submission of any details on the appointed day, the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC passed an ex-parte order confirming the addition made by the Assessing Officer. It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that the non-appearance was due to the inaction on the part of the then tax consultant. It is also his submission that given an opportunity, the assessee is in a position to substantiate his case by filing the requisite details before the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC. Considering the totality of the facts of the case Printed from counselvise.com 4 ITA No.919/PUN/2025 and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate his case by filing the requisite details and decide the issue as per fact and law. The assessee is also hereby directed to appear before the Ld. CIT(A)/ NFAC on the appointed date and make his submissions, if any, without seeking any adjournment under any pretext failing which the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC shall be at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. We hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes. 9. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 29th July, 2025. Sd/- Sd/- (ASTHA CHANDRA) (R. K. PANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; दिन ांक Dated : 29th July, 2025 GCVSR आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant; 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 3. 4. The concerned Pr.CIT, Pune DR, ITAT, ‘A’ Bench, Pune 5. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune Printed from counselvise.com 5 ITA No.919/PUN/2025 S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 28.07.2025 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 29.07.2025 Sr. PS/PS 3 Draft proposed & placed before the Second Member JM/AM 4 Draft discussed/approved by Second Member AM/AM 5 Approved Draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr. PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of Order Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr. PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order Printed from counselvise.com "