MR.SANKARANARAYANAN RAMASUBRAMANIAN,CHENNAI V. ACIT, NCC-7(1), CHENNAI

ITA 2508/CHNY/2024

AI Insights

The case revolves around the applicability of education cess on tax liabilities calculated under the rates prescribed by the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and the USA. The assessee, a USA citizen residing in India, contested the inclusion of education cess on his total tax liability, which included income taxed at special rates under the DTAA. The CPC initially levied education cess on the entire tax liability, which the assessee challenged through a rectification application and subsequent appeals. The Tribunal examined various precedents and the specific provisions of the India-USA DTAA, ultimately deciding that the education cess should not be applied separately on the income taxed at DTAA rates.

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 46048 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 31-12-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2022-2023
• Other Referred Cases: DDIT vs. The BOC Group Ltd., ITO vs. M/s M. Far Hotels Ltd., Sunil V. Motiani vs. ITO
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA)
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: R. KAVITHA LD.
• Assessee Lawyers: K. RAMAKRISHNAN LD
• Keywords: Rectification of order; Double taxation relief
• Section: 154

Judgement Text

"1 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “बी” \u000eा यपीठ चे\u0013ई म\u0016। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, CHENNAI मा ननीय \u0019ी मनोज क ुमा र अ वा ल ,लेखा सद# एवं मा ननीय \u0019ी मनु क ुमा र िग'र, \u000eा ियक सद# क े सम(। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM आयकरअपील सं ./ ITA No.2508/Chny/2024 (िनधा )रण वष) / Assessment Year: 2022-23) Shri Sankaranarayanan Ramasubramanian J-193/851, 6th Avenue, Anna Nagar S.O. Chennai-600 040. बना म/ Vs. ACIT Non-Corporate Circle-7(1) Chennai. \u0001थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AFRPR-4067-C (अपीलाथ /Appellant) : ( थ / Respondent) अपीलाथ कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri K. Ramakrishnan (CA) - Ld.AR थ कीओरसे/Respondent by : Ms. R. Kavitha (Addl.CIT) - Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 18-12-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 31-12-2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2022-23 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 30-07-2024 in the matter of an intimation issued by CPC u/s 154 of the Act on 02-05-2023 levying education cess on total tax liability including tax liability as per rates as prescribed under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The short question that arises for our consideration is to determine whether the education cess would apply to DTAA rates or not. 2 2. From case records, it emerges that the assessee is citizen of USA and residing permanently in India. The assessee declared income of Rs.668.30 Lacs out of which income earned in India amounted to Rs.9.13 Lacs. The CPC processed the return of income and raised demand of Rs.3.11 Lacs after levying education cess on entire tax including DTAA rates. The assessee preferred rectification application u/s 154 which was rejected. In first appeal, the assessee submitted that the rates as specified in DTAA include surcharge and surtax. The education cess would be applicable only for income earned in India. Reliance was placed on various decisions of Tribunal to support the same. However, Ld. CIT(A) rejected the same on the ground that education cess is an additional levy that is applied on the basic tax liability by the Government to generate revenue for education. The assessee claimed relief u/s 90. The case laws being relied upon by the assessee were held to be not applicable. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. 3. Upon perusal of rectification order u/s 154 dated 02-05-2023, it emerges that the total income as declared by the assessee for Rs.668.30 Lacs has been accepted by CPC. The income earned in India is Rs.9.13 Lacs whereas the remaining income is earned from abroad which has been subjected to tax at special rates as per DTAA. The Tax on normal income has been computed as Rs.0.92 Lacs whereas other tax at special rates has been computed as Rs.132.49 Lacs. The total tax liability thus works out to be Rs.133.41 Lacs. The same has also been accepted by CPC. The only dispute is that CPC has computed education cess on entire tax liability whereas the assessee has computed cess on tax liability only on income as arising in India. The Ld. CIT(A) has denied 3 the claim on the ground that the assessee has claimed relief u/s 90. However, in our considered opinion, tax rates are computed first and thereafter, applicable relief is granted to the assessee. As per Article 2(1)(b)(i) & (ii) of India-USA DTAA, surcharge and surtax are included in the maximum rates as specified under Articles 10 and 11 of DTAA. Therefore, when Article-2 states that surcharge is included in Income Tax and the Tax Rate as prescribed under Article 10 / 11 shall be deemed to include tax surcharge and since cess is nothing but an additional surcharge, the prescribed tax rates under DTAA shall be deemed to include the cess also. We find that this issue has been addressed in various decisions of Tribunal. In the decision of Kolkata Tribunal in the case of DDIT vs. The BOC Group Ltd. (ITA No.571/Kol/2013 dated 30-11-2015), it was held that surcharge and education cess is not leviable when the tax rates are prescribed under DTAA. Similar is the decision of Cochin Tribunal in ITO vs. M/s M. Far Hotels Ltd. (ITA Nos.430 to 435/Coch/2011 dated 05-04-2013) as well as the decision of Mumbai Tribunal in Sunil V. Motiani vs. ITO (ITA No.276/Mum/2012 dated 27-02-2013). No contrary decision has been shown to us. Accordingly, we hold that the tax rates as prescribed under DTAA would embed education cess as well. The CPC is directed to re- compute the tax liability of the assessee. 4. The appeal stand allowed in terms of our above order. Order pronounced on 31st December, 2024 Sd/- (MANU KUMAR GIRI) \u000eा ियक सद# / JUDICIAL MEMBER Sd/- (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) लेखा सद# / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER 4 चे4ई Chennai; िदनांक Dated : 31-12-2024 DS आदेशकी@ितिलिपअ ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ /Appellant 2. थ /Respondent 3. आयकरआयु=/CIT Chennai. 4. िवभागीय ितिनिध/DR 5. गाडBफाईल/GF "