VIPIN SETHI V. ASST. COMMI. OF INCOME TAX and ORS.

WP/3000/1992

AI Insights

The case involves a legal challenge against an order issued by the income tax authorities, which was later cancelled. The petitioners, Vipin Sethi and Ashwin Seth, challenged the order under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur. The legal representatives for the petitioners argued that the cancellation of the order rendered the petition infructuous. The court, upon reviewing the submissions and the cancellation of the order, dismissed the petition.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 760730 (HC-MADHYA_PRADESH)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 01-01-2023
• Assessment Year: misc
• Laws Referred To: Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India
• Result in Favour of: Others
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Department Lawyers: VIKAS SINHA
• Assessee Lawyers: VIKAS MISHRA
• Keywords: Cancellation of Order; Income Tax; Legal Proceedings
• Section: 226; 227

Judgement Text

"R E S P O N D E N T S : » 1 . A s s i s t a n t C O m m i s s i o n e r o f I n c o m e t ‘ E ‘ c i r c l e ( 1 ) , R a i p u r ( m a ) 2 . A s s i s t a n t C o m m i s s i o n e r o f I n c o m ’ e 1 ; a $ W a x d 2 ( 2 ) - c u m — N e w A s s e s s e e W a r d , V i g m r I n c o m e T a x O f f i c e , N a g p u r ( M . B . ) ‘ ' Vi 5 . C o m m i s s i o n e r o f I n c o m e T a x , _ $ 1 J a b a l p ' i i z ' ( M . P . ) P E T I T I O N U N D E R A R T I C L E S 2 2 6 / 2 2 7 O F m m G O N S T I T u m o w ; ; [ N D I A . k 1 M M ” ? 7 V 7 / ’ W i r \" ' c m n u o 1 1 1 u 3 4 A } ‘ \" @ y f I N T H E E E G H ‘ C O U R T O F M A D H Y A P R A D E S H A T J A B A L P U R ' 5 B L P . ‘ N 0 3 0 ‘ 0 0 9 2 w H _ P m m i o m a : V i p i n S e t h i s o n o f D i n a n a t h S e t h ' i ; a g e d 3 7 y e a r s , t h r o u g h A 1 7 ‘ c o r n e y A s h w i n s o n o f T i l a k c ‘ a j S e t h i a g e d 1 7 1 ‘ 3 0 y e a r s , r e a d i n g a t P r e m k u n j , c i v i l L i n e s ; R a i p u r ( M . P . ) » H ~ V e r ‘ a u s — mW X I — H C - 2 2 E W , W F % W W W W m m w g N O . . f Z ; ( ; C > % = [ % W W W § W W % W W B a r v e 1 6 . 6 . 2 0 0 5 S h r i V i n n y H a r i ' r , ‘ 5 r . A d v o c a ‘ f e w i - r h S h P i A s h o k S w a r n a k a r , A d v o c a f e f o r + h e p e ‘ r i f i o n e r . N a n a f o r T h e r e s p o n ‘ d e n 1 ' s . H e a r d . L e a r n e d S e n i o r C o u n s e l f o r ' r h e p e ‘ r i f i o n e r s u b m i f s ‘ r h a f i n V i e w o f T h e o r d e r d a f e d 1 2 ' 1 N o v e m b e r 1 9 9 2 f h e i m p u g n e d a r d e r h a s b e e n c a n c e l l e d , + h r e f o r e , T h i s p a i i ‘ i i o n h a s b e c o m e i n f r u c m o u s . I I n v i e w o f T h e a b o v e s u m i s s i o n m a d e b y l e a r n e d c o u n s e l f o r T h e p e T i T i o n e r a n d o r d e r d a f e d 1 2 m N o v e m b e r 1 9 9 2 , f h e , w r i f p e f i f i o n i s d i s m i s s e d a s h v i n g b e c o m e i n f r u c ‘ i u o u s . T h e o r d e r f i l e d b y i a r n e d S e n i o r C o u n s e l f o r f h e p e T i - ‘ i i o n e r b e k e p i o n r e c o r d . S d l - L . c . B H A D ° ° J u d g e l J ‘ ( @ 5 s ’ l i 3 i ) "