The case involves Ms. Madhumita Tripathy, the petitioner, challenging an order by the Income Tax Officer directing her to pay 20% of a disputed tax demand for the Assessment Year 2013-14, pending the appeal's disposal. The petitioner argued that the order was arbitrary, illegal, and violated several constitutional provisions and the Income Tax Act. The court considered previous judgments and amendments to the Income Tax Act, particularly focusing on the need for interim protection during the appeal process. The court's decision reflects a broader interpretation of the assessee's rights under the amended Act and judicial precedents.
Team Counselvise - March 13, 2026
Team Counselvise - February 05, 2026
Team Counselvise - February 03, 2026