The case involves a petition for restoration of Tax Case No. 24/2011, which had been dismissed due to non-compliance with a previous order dated 24.3.2011. The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Agrawal, filed the petition after a significant delay of 855 days, attributing the delay to the fault of his counsel. The respondent, the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Bilaspur, opposed the petition, arguing that the petitioner was not diligent in his duties. The court, after considering the submissions, decided to condone the delay and restore the case, emphasizing the responsibility of the petitioner's counsel in the delay.
Team Counselvise - February 03, 2026
Team Counselvise - March 09, 2026
Team Counselvise - February 07, 2026