RUCHI VARSHNEY,ALIGARH V. ITO WARD 4(1)(5), ALIGARH

ITA 511/AGR/2024

AI Insights

The case involves Smt. Ruchi Varshney, who appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, which confirmed the addition of Rs. 20.72 Lacs as unexplained cash credit by the Assessing Officer during the demonetization period. The assessee had declared an income of Rs. 3.35 Lacs and was scrutinized for cash deposits amounting to Rs. 20.72 Lacs. The Tribunal considered the Wealth Tax Return filed by the assessee for AY 2015-16, which detailed advances and cash-in-hand amounting to Rs. 18.75 Lacs, sufficient to explain the source of the deposits. The Tribunal criticized the CIT(A) for not considering the Wealth Tax Return in their decision.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 473706 (ITAT-AGRA)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 19-02-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SHAILENDRA SHRIVASTAVA LD.
• Assessee Lawyers: DEEPENDRA MOHAN LD
• Keywords: Unexplained cash credit; Liquidation
• Section: 69A

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, AGRA BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपील सं./ ITA No.511/Agr/2024 (िनधा \u0010रणवष\u0010 / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Smt. Ruchi Varshney 8/314, Opp. Gali Gurudwara Raghuvirpuri Banna Devi Aligarh – 202 001 बनाम/ Vs. ITO 4(1)(5) Aligarh \u0002थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AKDPV-1230-E (अपीलाथ\u001c/Appellant) : (\u001f थ\u001c / Respondent) अपीलाथ\u001cकीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Deependra Mohan (CA) – Ld. AR \u001f थ\u001cकीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri Shailendra Shrivastava – Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 19-02-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 19-02-2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 15-10-2024 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 09-12-2019. Having heard rival submissions and upon perusal of case records, the appeal is disposed-off as under. 2. The assessee being resident individual filed her return of income declaring income of Rs.3.35 Lacs. The case was picked up for scrutiny to verify the cash deposited by the assessee to the extent of Rs.20.72 Lacs 2 during demonetization period. In the absence of any representation as forthcoming from the assessee, Ld. AO added the amount of Rs.20.72 Lacs as unexplained cash credit u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE and framed the assessment. 3. During appellate proceedings, the assessee submitted that the cash was sourced from liquidation of advances and cash-in-hand as available with the assessee and the same was duly supported by her Wealth Tax Return filed for AY 2015-16 on 29-03-2016 i.e., much prior to the announcement of demonetization. In this return, the assessee reflected advances (assets) for Rs.11.60 Lacs and cash-in-hand for Rs.7.15 Lacs. Accordingly, the assessee pleaded for deletion of arbitrary addition as made by Ld. AO. However, without meeting the arguments of the assessee, Ld. CIT(A) simply confirmed the stand of Ld. AO. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. 4. Upon perusal of impugned order, it could be seen that wealth tax return claim of the assessee has been rejected by Ld. CIT(A) without even considering the same. Apparently, no cognizance has been taken of the wealth tax return as filed by the assessee. The copy of wealth tax return and computation thereof has been placed on Page Nos. 4 to 6 of the paper-book. This return has been filed on 29-03-2016 which is much before announcement of demonetization and the same therefore, could not be held to be an after-thought. In this return, the assessee has reflected loans and advances for Rs.11.60 Lacs and cash-in-hand for Rs.7.15 Lacs. The complete details of loans have separately been placed on record. Further, in this year, the assessee has declared income of Rs.3.35 Lacs. Putting all these components together, the source of impugned deposit of Rs.20.72 Lacs stand explained. Under 3 these circumstances, the impugned addition is liable to be deleted in toto. We order so. The Ld. AO is directed to re-compute the income of the assessee and revise the impugned demand as raised against the assessee for this year. 5. The appeal stand allowed in terms of our above order. Order pronounced on 19th February, 2025. Sd/- Sd/- (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) 6ा ियक सद7 /JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद7 / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 19-02-2025 Mks आदेश की 9ितिलिप अ;ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ\u001c/Appellant 2. \u001f थ\u001c/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु2/CIT 4. िवभागीय\u001fितिनिध/DR 5. गाड8फाईल/GF ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT AGRA "