"आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण कटक पीठ, कोलकाता में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH AT KOLKATA [वर्चुअल कोटु] [Virtual Court] श्री दचव्वचरु आरएल रेड्डी, उपाध्यक्ष (कोलकाता क्षेत्र) एवं श्री राक ेश धमश्रा, लेखा सदस्य क े समक्ष Before SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT (KZ) & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.: 107/CTK/2025 Assessment Year: 2025-26 Rural Educational Activities For Development Vs. CIT (Exemption), Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AAATR9762Q Appearances: Assessee represented by : Dr. Sanjay Behura and Ananta Narayan Singhbabu, ARs. Department represented by : Sanjay Kumar, CIT DR. Date of concluding the hearing : April 15th, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order : April 17th, 2025 ORDER PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)-Hyderabad [hereinafter referred to as the ‘Ld. CIT (Exemption)’] passed in respect of registration Page | 2 I.T.A. No.: 107/CTK/2025 Assessment Year: 2025-26 Rural Educational Activities For Development. u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for AY 2025-26 dated 22.08.2024. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. That the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) erred in law and on facts in rejecting the application for registration under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite the appellant fulfilling all statutory requirements and submitting requisite documents at Bhubaneswar office by hand to hand. 2. That the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) failed to appreciate that the activities of the trust are genuine and being carried out in accordance with the objectives stated in its bye-laws. 3. That the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) incorrectly held that the appellant is not entitled to registration under Section 80G without providing cogent reasons or considering the documentary evidence and explanations provided during the proceedings. 4. That the rejection of the appellant's application under Section 80G is arbitrary and unjustified as the trust/institution has been duly complying with all legal requirements and has not violated any conditions necessary for obtaining registration under Section 80G. 5. That the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) has overlooked the documents submitted by the Appellant Viz. Cash book, Vouchers, Bank statement, Audited Balance Sheet, Activities Report, Registration certificate and Affidavit etc. 6. That the appeal be allowed on the above ground (s) or such other grounds if any will be urged at the time of hearing of the appeal.” 2.1 The registry has informed that the appeal is delayed by 105 days. It is observed that along with the memo of appeal, the assessee has also filed an affidavit by Ms. Manjula Sahu, the Secretary seeking condonation of delay in which it is stated that the Secretary was suffering from severe illness and was unable to file the appeal at ITAT, Cuttack Bench within the due date. Hence the delay happened and she had not intentionally avoided the filing of the appeal. As the delay happened due to her illness, she has requested that the delay may be Page | 3 I.T.A. No.: 107/CTK/2025 Assessment Year: 2025-26 Rural Educational Activities For Development. condoned. Considering the application seeking condonation of delay and the reasons stated therein, we are satisfied that the assessee had a reasonable and sufficient cause and was prevented from filing the instant appeal within the statutory time limit. We, therefore, condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication on merit. 3. Rival submissions were heard and the record and the submissions made have been examined. During the course of appeal, it was submitted by the Ld. AR that the registration was denied on account of non-compliance by the assessee although the assessee had submitted the audit report and other required documents. Therefore, in the interest of justice, it was requested that the assessee may be granted another opportunity to file its submission in response to the notice issued by the Ld. CIT (Exemption) for justifying the genuineness of the activities and claim of exemption. It was also submitted that the Ld. CIT(E) failed to appreciate the genuineness of the activities and denied the registration under section 80G of the Act. The Ld. DR relied upon the order of the Ld. CIT(E) and requested that the same may be upheld. 4. We have considered the submissions made and observe that the registration was denied on account of non-compliance to the notice issued and also because proper representation was not made. Therefore, in the interest of justice, it was considered imperative to grant another opportunity to the assessee to make proper submission before the Ld. CIT(E). Hence, the order of the Ld. CIT (Exemption) is set aside and the matter is remanded to him for deciding the application afresh after granting an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and allowing the assessee to make proper submission in respect of the queries raised and in accordance with law. Page | 4 I.T.A. No.: 107/CTK/2025 Assessment Year: 2025-26 Rural Educational Activities For Development. 5. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 17th April, 2025. Sd/- Sd/- [Duvvuru RL Reddy] [Rakesh Mishra] Vice President (KZ) Accountant Member Dated: 17.04.2025 Bidhan (P.S.) Page | 5 I.T.A. No.: 107/CTK/2025 Assessment Year: 2025-26 Rural Educational Activities For Development. Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Rural Educational Activities For Development, At- Main Road Ambapua, Near Odisa Office, Ganjam, Brahmapur, Odisha, 760016. 2. CIT (Exemption), Hyderabad. 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- 5. CIT(DR), Cuttack Bench, Cuttack. 6. Guard File. //True copy // By order Assistant Registrar ITAT, Kolkata Benches Kolkata "