S. Mahendra Pal Singh V. Union of India

WP/2541/2002

AI Insights

In the case of S. Mahendra Pal Singh versus Union of India & Others, the petitioner, S. Mahendra Pal Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. The case was called for hearing twice, but neither the petitioner nor any representative appeared to pursue the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition due to lack of prosecution, indicating that the petitioner might not be interested in continuing with the case.

• Counselvise Citation: [2013] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 701056 (HC-CHHATTISGARH)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 07-05-2013
• Assessment Year: misc
• Laws Referred To: Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Keywords: Dismissal for want of prosecution; Writ petition
• Section: 226; 227

Judgement Text

"I N T H E H I G H C O U R T O F J U D I C A ‘ I ‘ U R E C H H A T T I S G A R H A T B I W W R V I ? / g m P E T I T I O N m . g o § ; \" 1 W C F 2 0 0 2 ? E T I ' I T O N E R g S . M a h e n d r a P a l S i n g h S / O S . B h u p e n d r a S i n g h / M a h a v e e r P a r a , D o n g a r g a r h D i s - h t . R a j n a n d g a o n ( C . G . ) w . ¢ \" z V E R S M S 5 V R E $ 9 0 N D E N 1 $ £ h n i o n o f I n d i a , T h r o u g h / $ e c r e t a r y M i n i s t r y o f F 1 n a n c e , N o r t h B l o c k N e w D e l h i . ( 2 C e n t r a l B o a r d o f D i r e c t T a x e s , N e w D e l h i . ( 3 ) C o m m i s s i o n e r o f I n c o m e - T a x N e w C e n t r a l R e v e n u e B u i l d i n g c i v i l L i n e s , R a i p u r ( C . G . ) ( 4 ) I n c o m e - T a x O f f i c e r W a r d - 2 - R a j n a n d g a o n ( C . G . ) f P E T I T I O N U N D E R A R l l C L § 2 2 6 / 2 2 7 O F T H E C O N S T I T U T I O N F O R O F I N D I A A A W R I T I N 1 H E N A I U R E O F M A N D A M U $ C E R T I O R A R I E T C . ) ‘ H I G H C O U R T O F C H H A T T I S G A R H : B I L A S P U R W R I T P E T I T I O N N O . 2 5 4 1 O F 2 0 0 2 x S . M a h e n d r a P a l S i n g h V e r s u s R E S P O N D E N T S U n i o n o f I n d i a & O t h e r s P E T I T I O N E R ( W r i t P e t i t i o n u n d e r A r t i c l e 2 2 6 / 2 2 7 o f t h e C o n s t i t u t i o n o f I n d i a ) S i n g l e B e n c h : H o n ’ b l e S h r i S a t i s h K . A g n i h o t r i , J . P r e s e n t : — N o n e f o r t h e p e t i t i o n e r . O R D E R ( O P E N C O U R T 1 ( P a s s e d ' o n t h i s 7 t h d a y o f M a y , 2 0 1 3 ) . t ’ 1 . T h e m a t t e r i s c a l l e d f o r h e a r i n g t w i c e . N o n e a p p e a r s n o r i s a n y r e p r e s e n t a t i o n m a d e o n b e h a l f o f t h e p e t i t i o n e r s . T h e p e t i t i o n e r s r n a y n o t b e i n t e r e s t e d i n p u r s u i n g t h e m a t t e r . 2 ) l n V i e w o f t h e a b o v e , t h e m a t t e r i s d i s m i s s e d f o r w a n t o f p r o s e c u t i o n . - % / m o m - r ‘ s a n s “ K ' A g “ ' a i "