SCHOOL OF ENGIERING AND APPLIED SCIENCES,NEW DELHI V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ASSESSMENT UNIT, DELHI

ITA 7518/DEL/2025

AI Insights

The case involves the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, which appealed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) confirming additions made by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) in the assessment year 2020-21. The additions included denial of benefits under section 12A, undisclosed interest income, and unexplained investments. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had a valid registration under section 12A during the relevant period and had not been given a fair opportunity to present its case at the lower levels, leading to the decision to set aside the lower orders and restore the matter for fresh assessment.

• Counselvise Citation: [2026] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 845022 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 20-03-2026
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: E
• Assessment Year: 2020-2021
• Appeal Filed On: 20-11-2025
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RAVI KANT CHOUDHARY
• Assessee Lawyers: PRIYANSH JAIN
• Keywords: Opportunity of being heard; Unexplained investment; Principle of natural justice; Source of fund; Competent authority; FORM 26AS
• Section: 143(3); 11; 12A; 12

Judgement Text

"1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 7518DEL/2025; A.Y.: 2020-21 School of Engineering and Applied Sciences B-II/100, Delhi Mathura Road M.C.I.E Badarpur, New Delhi- 44 Vs Income Tax Officer, Assessment Unit (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AACTS5611F Assessee by : Shri Priyansh Jain, CA Revenue by : Shri Ravi Kant Choudhary, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 18.03.2026 Date of Pronouncement: 20.03.2026 ORDER PER RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, JM : This appeal is directed against order dated 13.10.2025 passed by NFAC [hereinafter referred to as , “Ld. CIT(A)”] u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter, referred to as, “Act”] wherein addition made vide assessment order dated 03.02.2021 was confirmed and appeal was dismissed ex-parte. 2. The facts in brief as culled out from the proceedings of the Ld. Lower Authorities are that the assessee filed return of income for relevant A.Y. 2020-21 on 10.01.2021 declaring NIL Income. Printed from counselvise.com 2 The case was selected for compulsory scrutiny on the issue “Registration/Approval under various sections of IT Act have not been granted or have been cancelled/withdrawn”. The assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Act as the assessee has failed to supply the requisite information with respect to the registration u/s 12A and other details asked for during the assessment proceeding. 2.1 In the assessment order 3 Additions were made and the First Addition of Rs. 10,787/- was made by refusing benefit of 12A in the absence of filing the proof of valid registration u/s 12A(1)(ab) and, further observing that vide order dated 03.02.2021, the Commissioner Income Tax (Exemption) had rejected the application u/s 12A(1)(ab). The second addition was made of Rs. 1,44,901/- with respect to interest income appearing in Form 26AS of the assessee. The Third Addition was made u/s 69A with respect to the time deposit of Rs. 96,75,000/- in account of assessee maintained in Indian Bank. Aggrieved by the assessment order, assessee filed an appeal before Ld. CIT(A) who dismissed the same ex-parte as assessee allegedly failed to make compliance in pursuance to the notice sent on four dates as mentioned in Para 8.1 of the impugned order. Printed from counselvise.com 3 Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal and has raised the following grounds of appeal: “1. That the Ld. AO has erred in law and in facts in selecting the present case for conducting compulsory scrutiny based on the reason \"related to registration/approval under various sections of the Act, such as 124.35(1)(ii)/(iia)/(iii), 10(23C), etc.:- Cases where registration/approval under various sections of the Act, such as section 12A, 35(1)(ii)/(iia)/(iii), 10(23C), etc. have not been granted or have been cancelled/withdrawn by the Competent Authority, yet the assessee has been found to be claiming tax exemption/deduction in the return\", when registration of the assessee was valid in the subject year. 2. That the Ld. AO has erred in law and on the facts by passing the order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144B without granting adequate opportunity of being heard and in violation of principles of natural justice. The order is bad in law and without jurisdiction. 3. That the Ld, AO has erred in concluding that the appellant is not entitled to benefits available to persons registered under section 12A/12AA, ignoring documents and submissions made during assessment proceedings, more so, when registration of the assessee was valid till 31.03.2021. 4. That the Ld. AO has erred in law and on facts in making addition of Rs. 10,787/- by denying benefit of section 11 and 12 to the assessee and holding that the assessee is not entitled for any benefits available to persons registered u/s 12A of the Act. 5. That the Ld. AO has erred in law and on facts in making an addition of 21,44,901 as undisclosed interest income of the assessee solely based on entries in Form 26AS. Printed from counselvise.com 4 6. That the learned Assessing Officer has erred in treating aggregate time deposits of 296,75,000 as unexplained investments u/s 69, without appreciating the source of funds, nature of deposits, and the explanations furnished by the appellant. 7. That the learned Assessing Officer has wrongly initiated penalty proceedings under sections 270A and 271AAC, as the additions/disallowances themselves are unjustified and not sustainable in law. 8. That the appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend, or withdraw any ground of appeal at the time of hearing.” 3. We have heard the Ld. AR and the Ld. DR and perused the material placed on record. Ld. AR, at the outset, submitted that the assessee has placed on record before the Assessing Officer the old registration u/s 12A placed at page 13 of the Paperbook before the completion of the assessment proceedings. It is further fairly admitted that the renewed approval u/s 12A registration dated 14.09.2021 valid from A.Y. 2022-23 to 2026-27 placed at page No. 18 to 20 of the Paperbook could not be placed before the Ld. AO. It is, therefore, submitted that the matter may be restored to the Ld. AO for giving an opportunity to the assessee to present all these documents with respect to the valid approval u/s 12A(1)(ab) and also with respect to other addition made by the Ld. AO. The Ld. DR for the revenueon the other hand, submitted that the assessee has failed to avail the opportunity granted by Ld. CIT(A) who had Printed from counselvise.com 5 no option except to pass the order ex-parte and therefore, prayed for dismissing the appeal of the assessee. 4. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material placed on record. The assessee successfully demonstrated before us that the assessee was having a valid Registration Certificate for the year under consideration and it was registered u/s 12AB since 2002 and further that the renewal of the Registration had been granted vide certificate dated 24.09.2021 for A.Y. 2022-23 to 2026-27. In view of these facts and the documentary evidences brought to our notice, we deem it expedient to restore the matter to the file of the Ld. AO for considering the material evidence which will be submitted or has been submitted before the Ld. AO by the assessee for his consideration. The impugned order for the above reasons is being set-aside. The matter is restored to the file of Ld. Assessing Officer to decide it afresh. The assessee should present its case before the Ld. AO within a period of 60 days from this order. 5. Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Sd/- Sd/- (BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH) (RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 20.03.2026 Pooja Mittal, Sr. PS Printed from counselvise.com 6 Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi Printed from counselvise.com "