SHIV BAHUUDHESHIYA SEVABHAVI SANSTHA ,BEED V. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

ITA 1202/PUN/2025

AI Insights

The case involves Shiv Bahuudheshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha, an organization seeking registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was initially rejected by the CIT (Exemption), Pune due to non-compliance with notices requesting information to verify the genuineness of the organization's activities. The organization appealed against this decision, arguing that the notices were missed and the required information was available but not submitted due to oversight. The Tribunal found merit in the organization's argument and remanded the case back to the CIT (Exemption), Pune for a fresh decision.

• Counselvise Citation: [2025] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 712423 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-07-2025
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Assessment Year: misc
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: AMIT BOBDE
• Assessee Lawyers: UMESHKUMAR MALI
• Keywords: Opportunity of being heard; Corroborative evidences
• Section: 12A

Judgement Text

" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI VINAY BHAMORE, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.1202/PUN/2025 Shiv Bahuudheshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha, Majalgaon, Beed- 431122. PAN : AAMTS6927Q Vs. CIT (Exemption), Pune. Appellant Respondent आदेश / ORDER PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 05.11.2024 passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune rejecting the application for registration u/s 12AB of the IT Act. 2. Facts of the case, in brief, are, that the assessee filed application for registration in Form No.10AB under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the IT Act on 29.06.2024. With a view to verify the genuineness of activities of the assessee and compliance Assessee by : Shri Umesh Kumar Mali Revenue by : Shri Amit Bobde Date of hearing : 24.07.2025 Date of pronouncement : 28.07.2025 Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1202/PUN/2025 2 to requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the trust/institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects, a notice was issued by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune through ITBA portal on 09.08.2024 requesting the assessee to upload certain information/clarification. The assessee did not comply to this notice. Another notice was issued on 21-10-2024 to furnish desired information & the assessee was specifically asked to show cause why the application for registration should not be rejected. Since the assessee did not comply to this notice also and has not furnished any explanation in reply to the above notice, Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune rejected the application filed by the assessee by observing as under :- “5. The information / details were called for under the provisions of section 12AB(1)(b)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. These are the basic details required to ascertain the overall nature of the activities of the assessee and are directly relevant to the present proceedings. However, the assessee has failed to comply despite giving sufficient opportunities as discussed above including an opportunity of being heard. 6. Thus, the assessee has failed to furnish the details called for under the provisions of section 12AB(1)(b)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to verify the genuineness of activities of the trust / institution and to verify the compliance to requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the trust / institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects. 7. In absence of the compliance to the above requirement, it is not possible to arrive at any conclusion about the genuineness of Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1202/PUN/2025 3 activities of the assessee and the compliance to the requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the trust / institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects. 8. It is clear from the above that the assessee was given sufficient opportunity to comply, but it has not complied to the same. It seems that the assessee is not having any supporting documents / evidence to submit. The assessee has failed to comply with the provisions of section 12AB(1)(b)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Hence, the undersigned is unable to draw any satisfactory conclusion about genuineness of activities of the assessee and the compliance to the requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the trust / institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects. Therefore, the undersigned has left no alternative but to reject the application. 9. In view of the above, the application filed by the assessee is hereby rejected and the provisional registration granted on 29/03/2022 under section 12AB read with section 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is hereby cancelled.” 2.1. It is the above order against which the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. 3. Ld. AR appearing from the side of the assessee submitted before us that the order passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune is not justified. It is submitted that somehow the notices issued by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune were missed and could not be seen by the assessee therefore the information & documents desired by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune could not be furnished before him. Ld. AR submitted that since no reply was furnished before Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune the application for approval u/s 12A of the IT Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1202/PUN/2025 4 Act was rejected. Ld. AR submitted that the desired information is very well available with the assessee & if one opportunity is provided to him he will be able to produce all such desired information before Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune. Accordingly, Ld. AR requested before the Bench to set-aside the impugned order passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune, involving the issue of registration u/s 12AB of the IT Act & requested to remand the matter back to him with a direction to decide the application for registration u/s 12AB of the IT Act afresh. 4. Ld. DR appearing from the side of the Revenue supported the order passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune and requested to confirm the same. 5. In this regard, we find that admittedly two notices were issued by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune & both the above notices were not complied by the assessee. It is the sole contention of Ld. Counsel of the assessee that if the assessee has not furnished requisite information/documents on the requisite date, one further opportunity should have been provided to him by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune. It was also contended that the authorised person Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1202/PUN/2025 5 somehow missed the notices issued by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune & therefore could not supply the desired documents to the consultant who resultantly could not reply to the notices issued by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune, which consequently resulted in rejection of application for registration u/s 12AB of the IT Act. It was the sole prayer of Ld. AR that if one more opportunity is provided to the assessee, he will furnish all the desired documents/evidences and supporting evidences before Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune in support of application for registration u/s 12AB of the IT Act. 5.1 We find some force in the above arguments of Ld. Counsel of the assessee. Considering the totality of the facts of the case & in the interest of justice and without going into the merits of the case, we deem it appropriate to set-aside the order passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune and remand the matter back to him with a direction to decide the application for approval afresh as per fact and law after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also hereby directed to comply with the notices issued by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune and produce requisite Printed from counselvise.com ITA No.1202/PUN/2025 6 documents/information in support of the application for registration without taking any adjournment under any pretext, otherwise Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune shall be at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. Thus, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are partly allowed. 6. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on this 28th day of July, 2025. Sd/- Sd/- (R. K. PANDA) (VINAY BHAMORE) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER पुणे / Pune; ᳰदनांक / Dated : 28th July, 2025. Sujeet आदेश कᳱ ᮧितिलिप अᮕेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant. 2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent. 3. The CIT, Exemption, Pune. 4. The Pr. CIT/CIT concerned. 5. िवभागीय ᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “B” बᱶच, पुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. 6. गाडᭅ फ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune. Printed from counselvise.com "