"IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PANAJI BENCH PANAJI BEFORE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI G D PADMAHSHALI ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I T A. Nos. 288/PAN/2024 (A.Y. 2024-25) Shree Geeta Dharam Mandal, Opp:Gram Panchayat, Anjuna Bardez, Anjuna-403509 Goa. Vs . CIT (Exemptions), Unity Building Annex, Mission Road, Bangalore-560027, Karnataka. . PAN .No. AAWTS4171Q (अपीलाथŎ/Appellant) (ŮȑथŎ/Respondent) Assessee by None(Letter 5-03-2025) Revenue by Shri.Captain Pradeep Arya.DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing 05.03.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement 06.03.2025 ORDER PER BENCH: The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)(CIT(E)), Bangalore passed u/sec12AB(I)(b)(ii) of the Act. The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the order of the CIT(E) rejecting the application filed fror registration u/sec12AB of the Act. 2. The brief facts of the case are that, the assessee is a charitable trust and is undertaking charitable activities as per the trust deed dated 30-08-2018. The assesse was 2 ITA No. 288/Pan/2024 Shree Geeta Dharam Mandal . granted provisional registration under section 12AB of the Act in Form.no.10AC on 27-05-2021. Subsequently, as per the amended, provisions of section 12AB of the Act, The assessee for the purpose of permanent registration has uploaded e-application in Form. No.10AB on 15-03-2024 and since there was no proper compliance to the notices of hearing, the same was rejected by the CIT(E). Aggrieved by the CIT(E) order, the assessee has filed before the Honble Tribunal. 3. We have heard the Ld.DR submissions and perused the material available on record. The assessee has filed the application before the CIT(E) for permanent registration under section 12A of the Act, whereas the CIT(E) in course of hearing proceedings has issued e-notice on the assessee through ITBA portal for certain clarifications and additional information to verify the genuineness of the activities of the trust. Since there was no proper response to the notices in spite of providing sufficient opportunities to the assessee, the CIT(E) has rejected the application. Hence we considering, the facts, circumstances and the principles of natural justice shall provide with one more opportunity of hearing to the assesse to substantiate the case along with evidences and information. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order and direct the CIT(E) to denovo consider the application as per the law and we 3 ITA No. 288/Pan/2024 Shree Geeta Dharam Mandal . allow the grounds of appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes. 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 06.03.2025. Sd/- Sd/- (GD PADMAHSHALI) (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Panaji Dated: 06/03/2025 Copy of the Order forwarded to: 1. The Appellant, 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT(A)- 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, 6. Guard file. //True Copy// BY ORDER, (Asstt. Registrar)ITAT, Panaji 4 ITA No. 288/Pan/2024 Shree Geeta Dharam Mandal . Date Initial 1. Draft dictated on PS 2. Draft placed before author PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before the second member PS 4. Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. PS 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on 7. File sent to the Bench Clerk 8. Date on which file goes to the AR 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk. 10. Date of dispatch of Order. 11. Dictation Pad is enclosed "