Sri Krishnappa Nagesh Prasad V. The Income Tax Officer Ward-4(3)(3) and National Faceless Assessment Centre and The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

WP/21158/2024

AI Insights

The case involves Sri Krishnappa Nagesh Prasad, the petitioner, who challenged several notices and orders issued by the Income Tax Department under various sections of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2016-17. The petitioner contended that he did not receive the notices and thus could not respond to them, leading to the issuance of subsequent orders and penalties. The respondents argued that the petition lacked merit. The court, after hearing both parties, decided to set aside the notices and orders and remand the case for fresh consideration, allowing the petitioner an opportunity to respond.

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 795724 (HC-KARNATAKA)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 13-08-2024
• Assessment Year: misc
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Others
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Department Lawyers: E I SANMATHI
• Assessee Lawyers: RAVI S V
• Keywords: Assessment Year 2016-17; Income Tax; Notices quashed; Reconsideration; Writ of Certiorari
• Section: 147; 144; 271(1)(c); 271F; 144B; 148A(b); 148A(d); 226; 227

Judgement Text

" - 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:32405 WP No. 21158 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.21158 OF 2024 (T-IT) BETWEEN: SRI KRISHNAPPA NAGESH PRASAD AGED 55 YEARS S/O G KRISHNAPPA NO.003, NO.70 FORTUNE ENCLAVE 2ND MAIN ROAD MUNESHWARA LAYOUT K C HALLI, B G ROAD BANGALORE - 560 076 PREVIOUSLY AT SRI KRISHNAPPA NAGESH PRASAD AGED 55 YEARS S/O G KRISHNAPPA NO.31, 5TH PHASE THIRUMALESHWARA KAVERI ROAD 18TH CROSS SMS LAYOUT J P NAGAR BANGALORE – 560 078 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR S.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-4(3)(3) BANGALORE - 560 095 2. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL / JOINT / DEPUTY / ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX / INCOME TAX OFFICER INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT MINISTRY OF FINANCE ROOM NO.401, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM DELHI – 110 003 Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:32405 WP No. 21158 of 2024 3. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX THE OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C R BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148A(B) OF THE ACT DATED 17.02.2023 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022-23/1049852308(1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner has sought for the following reliefs: \"i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act dated 17/02/2023 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022-23/1049852308(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A. ii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act dated 01/03/2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022-23/1050299323(1) Issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A1. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:32405 WP No. 21158 of 2024 iii) Issue of writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act dated 10/03/2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1050611513(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A2. Iv) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under section 148 of the Act, dated 11/03/2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022- 23/1050646616(1), issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A3. v) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order passed under section 147 r.w.s 144, 144B dated 24/01/2024 bearing DIN: ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1060060188(1) issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A4. vi) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Act dated 10/06/2024 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(c)/2024-25/1065512037(1) by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A5. vii) Issue of writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order dated 10/06/2024 issued under section 271F of the Act bearing DIN and Notice No.ITBA/PNL/F/271F/2024-25/1065512039(1) by the - 4 - NC: 2024:KHC:32405 WP No. 21158 of 2024 Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure - A6. viii) And pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.\" 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record. 3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that notices issued by the respondents under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘IT Act’) dated 17.02.2023 and 01.03.2023 was not received by petitioner and he was not aware of the notices and consequently, petitioner could not submit his reply / response along with documents to the said notices. It is submitted that the inability and omission on the part of the petitioner to submit reply / response along with documents to the Section 148A(b) notices was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and as such, if one more opportunity is provided to the petitioner to do so by setting aside the impugned orders and notices, the petitioner would do so and respondents may be directed to proceed further in accordance with law. - 5 - NC: 2024:KHC:32405 WP No. 21158 of 2024 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed. 5. A perusal of the impugned order will indicate that it is an undisputed fact that petitioner has not submitted reply / response along with documents to Section 148A(b) notices. Under these circumstances, in view of the specific assertion on the part of the petitioner that his inability and omission to submit a reply along with documents to Section 148A(b) notices was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and if one more opportunity is granted, petitioner would submit reply along with documents, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order at Annexure-A2 dated 10.03.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) of the IT Act and subsequent notice / orders, etc., and remit the matter back to respondent No.2 for reconsideration afresh from the stage of submitting of reply by the petitioner to Section 148A(b) notices and to proceed further in accordance with law. - 6 - NC: 2024:KHC:32405 WP No. 21158 of 2024 6. In the result, pass the following: ORDER (i) The petition is hereby allowed. (ii) Impugned notices / orders at Annexures A2, A3, A4, A5 and A6 are hereby set aside. (iii) Matter is remitted back to respondent No.2 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law from the stage of submitting of reply to the Show Cause Notices under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act at Annexures – A and A1 dated 17.02.2023 and 01.03.2023. (iv) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit replies, responses, pleadings, documents, etc., to the respondent, who shall consider the same, provide sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and proceed further in accordance with law. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2 "