SRI. MUKRAMULLA ASADULLA KHAN V. INCOME TAX OFFICER

WP/15062/2022

AI Insights

The case involves Sri Mukramulla Asadulla Khan, the petitioner, challenging the notices and subsequent assessment orders issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Mysore, under Section 148 and Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner contended that the notices and orders were issued without jurisdiction and violated principles of natural justice. The respondent argued that the petition lacked merit. The court found that the petitioner was not given a sufficient opportunity to respond due to his absence and the hurried issuance of the orders, leading to the setting aside of the orders and remittance of the matter for fresh consideration.

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 768262 (HC-KARNATAKA)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 22-09-2022
• Assessment Year: misc
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Others
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Department Lawyers: K V ARAVIND
• Assessee Lawyers: VANI
• Keywords: Assessment Order; Jurisdiction; Natural Justice; Writ of Certiorari; Writ of Mandamus
• Section: 147; 148; 144

Judgement Text

" 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.15062 OF 2022 (T-IT) BETWEEN: SRI. MUKRAMULLA ASADULLA KHAN S/O LATE SRI ASADULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.374, M K VILLA M G ROAD, NEHRU PARK UDAYAGIRI MYSORE-571019. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. VANI.H., ADVOCATE) AND: INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1) ’AAYAKAR BHAWAN’ NO.21/16, RESIDENCY ROAD, NAZARBAD, MYSORE-570008 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE NOTICE BEARING NO.ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-21/1032002615(1) DTD: 31.3.2021 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14 AT ANNEXURE-E AND NOTICE BEARING NO. ITBA/AST/S/148/2020- 21/1032002619(1) DTD 31.3.2021 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15 AT ANNEXURE-F, BOTH ARE ISSUED U/S 148 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 BY THE RESPONDENT AS ONE WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND ETC. THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- 2 ORDER In this petition, petitioner has sought for the following reliefs: a) Issue a writ of certiorari or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari to set-aside the notice bearing No.ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-21/1032002615(1) dated 31.03.2021 for the assessment year 2013-14 at Annexure-E and notice bearing No.ITBA/AST/ S/148/2020-21/1032002619(1) dated 31.3.2021 for the assessment year 2014-15 at Annexure-F, both are issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the respondent as one without jurisdiction; b) Issue a writ of certiorari or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari to set-aside the assessment order bearing No.ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1042214820(1) dated 31.3.2022 for the assessment year 2013-14 at Annexure-K and assessment order bearing No.ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1042283951(1) dated 31.3.2022 for the assessment year 2014-15 at Annexure-L, both are passed u/s 147 r/w Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the respondent along with the respective demand notices for each year as void or barred by limitation, lacking jurisdiction and or in violation of principles of natural justice; c) Alternatively, issue a writ of mandamus or a direction in the nature of writ of mandamus to afford reasonable opportunity to petitioner to rebut the proposals and to pass appropriate orders afresh in accordance with law for both the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15 and 3 d) To pass any other order or direction as deemed fit by this Honourable Court, to meet the ends of justice and equity. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material on record. 3. The material on record discloses that pursuant to the notices dated 17.11.2021, 17.12.2021 and 11.03.2022 issued by the respondent, the petitioner was not in a position to file the response along with the documents since he was not in station and a request was made by the Accounts Assistant of the petitioner in this regard. Despite the said request being made by the petitioner, the respondent issued further notice on 20.03.2022 and proceeded to hurriedly pass the impugned ex-parte assessment order dated 31.03.2022 and as such, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the present petition. 4 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed. 5. Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, having regard to the fact that no sufficient or reasonable opportunity was granted to the petitioner to submit his response / reply along with the documents despite request in this regard having been made by the petitioner through his Accounts Assistant, without expressing any opinion on the merits / demerits of the rival contentions, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned assessment order at Annexures – K and N and remit the matter back to the respondent for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law. 6. In the result, I pass the following: ORDER (i) Petition is hereby allowed. 5 (ii) Impugned assessment orders at Annexures – K and L both dated 31.03.2022 are hereby set aside. (iii) Matter is remitted back to the respondent for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law. (iv) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to file his response / reply along with the documents to Annexures – E and F, which shall be considered by the respondent after providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter, to conclude the proceedings, in accordance with law. (v) All rival contentions are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same. Sd/- JUDGE SV "