Thuppilikai Hamza V. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle I and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-III and Manager, State Bank of India and Branch Manager, HDFC Bank and Branch Manager, Canara Bank and Branch Manager, Industrial Development Bank of India and Branch Manager, Federal Bank

WP(C)/26516/2023

AI Insights

The writ petition filed by Thuppilikai Hamza sought to expedite the consideration of a stay petition related to an income tax assessment order. The petitioner had appealed against the assessment order and simultaneously filed a stay petition to prevent the enforcement of garnishee notices issued to several banks during the pendency of the appeal. The High Court of Kerala, after hearing the arguments, directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-III to promptly address the stay petition and defer any further proceedings related to the assessment and garnishee notices until the stay petition is resolved.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 798092 (HC-KERALA)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 16-08-2023
• Assessment Year: misc
• Result in Favour of: Others
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Department Lawyers: JOSE JOSEPH; A KUMAR; GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
• Assessee Lawyers: ANIL NAIR; TELMA RAJU; AADITYA NAIR
• Keywords: Appeal; Assessment Order; Garnishee; Income Tax; Stay Petition

Judgement Text

"IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 25TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 26516 OF 2023 PETITIONER: THUPPILIKAI HAMZA, VALAPPIL HOUSE, ABDU RAHIMAN NAGAR, ADBU RAHIMAN NAGAR S.O, MALAPURAM, PIN - 676305 BY ADVS.ANIL D. NAIR TELMA RAJU AADITYA NAIR RESPONDENTS: 1 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE I, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NORTH BLOCK, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673001 2 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) (deleted) NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE (NFAC), NEW DELHI, PIN – 110001 (Respondent No.2 substituted) 2 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-III, CR BUILDING, I.S. PRESS ROAD, KOCHI 682 036. (Substituted as second respondent as per the order dated 16.8.2023 in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in W .P .(C)No.26516/23) 3 THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA THIRURANGADI P .O, P .B. NO.4, RAHIM BUILDINGS, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT , KERALA, PIN – 676306 4 THE BRANCH MANAGER, HDFC BANK, THIRURANGADI P .O, PMH COMPLEX, GROUND FLOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT , KERALA, PIN – 676306 5 THE BRANCH MANAGER, CANARA BANK, THIRURANGADI, NEXT TO PANCHAYAT OFFICE, MAIN ROAD CHEMMAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT , KERALA, PIN – 676306 6 THE BRANCH MANAGER, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA, SATYEN NIWASPAN, BAZAR CORNER OF M.G. ROAD &PAN BAZAR, S.C. KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE, KERALA, PIN – 673001 7 THE BRANCH MANAGER, FEDERAL BANK, MAJESTIC TOWER, PARAPPANANGADI ROAD, CHEMMAD, THIRURANGADI P .O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT , KERALA, PIN – 676306 SRI JOSE JOSEPH ,SRI A KUMAR .SRI GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 26516 OF 2023 :: 2 :: JUDGMENT Dated this the 16th day of August 2023 The writ petition is filed to direct the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P8 stay petition, expeditiously. 2. The petitioner’s case is that, aggrieved by Ext.P1 assessment order, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal before the second respondent. During the pendency of the appeal, the respondents have issued Exts.P3 to P7 notices to the respondents 3 to 7, in the status of garnishees. Immediately, on 31.7.2023, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P8 stay petition before the second respondent. The petitioner apprehends that during the pendency of Exts.P2 and P8, the respondent may enforce Exts.P3 to P7 notices. Hence, the writ petition. 3. Heard; Sri.Anil D Nair, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Jose Joseph, the learned Standing WP(C) NO. 26516 OF 2023 :: 3 :: Counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2, Sri.A.Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent and Sri.Gopikrishnan Nambiar, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the fifth respondent. In view of the limited relief that I propose to pass, I dispense with notice to the respondents 4, 6 and 7. 4. Having considered the pleadings and materials on record and taking note of the fact that Ext.P8 stay petition is pending consideration before the second respondent since 31.7.2023, I deem it appropriate to direct the second respondent to consider and dispose of the same immediately. Resultantly, I order the writ petition as follows: (i) The second respondent is directed to consider and dispose of Ext.P8 stay petition, in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the judgment. WP(C) NO. 26516 OF 2023 :: 4 :: (ii) If the second respondent proposes to pass any conditional interim order of stay, it shall state reasons for the same. (iii) Until such time orders are passed on Ext.P8 stay petition, all further proceedings pursuant to Exts.P1 and P3 to P7 shall stand deferred. sd/- C.S.DIAS JUDGE jes WP(C) NO. 26516 OF 2023 :: 5 :: APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26516/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2019-2020 DATED 31.03.2023 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2019-2020 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 13.7.2023 SERVED ON THE 3RD RESPONDENT. Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 13.7.2023 SERVED ON THE 4TH RESPONDENT. Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 13.7.2023 SERVED ON THE 5TH RESPONDENT. Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 13.7.2023 SERVED ON THE 6TH RESPONDENT. Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 13.7.2023 SERVED ON THE 7TH RESPONDENT. Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2019-2020 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER "